this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45317 readers
75 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So for those of you humoring bots: https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/08/1139962

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Islamic terrorism has almost exclusively been the domain of Wahhabists like Al-Queada and Islamic State

And, you know... some other guys...

Also, uh... some people closer to home

And lest they be forgotten...

There's an old joke about the Anti-American Terrorist and the Pro-American Freedom Fighter being the same dude pointed in different directions. The Taliban, being once again in control of the Afghani government, isn't going to see itself as a "terrorist organization" any more than the Philadelphia PD bombing your house would.

The Taliban is currently fighting Islamic State Khorasan Province, which is largely constituted of former collaborators of the coalition government.

The Moderate Rebels! Easy to forget that ISIS used to be an ally of

  • Israel
  • Syria
  • Turkey
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Qatar
  • United States

By turns. I'm sure that, while folks on CNN clutch their pearls and cry to the heavens about the horrors perpetuated by the Taliban on women, LGBTQ groups, minority religions, cough drug traffickers cough, and American business interests in the region, we're going to hear very little about the politics of this particular incarnation of the Islamic State.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I specified "Islamic terrorists" for a reason but go off.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If the CIA sends aid to the Islamic State, what do we call that?

[–] sudo@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I said "Islamic terrorism is almost exclusively the domain of wahhabi's" and you're argueing, "what if the CIA funded the wahhabi's?" as though that contradicts my point.

I don't know what the disagreement is. Its always the wahhabi's executing the actual terrorism. If you want to lump in their sponsors, like is said, "go off". But you're framing it like I'm ignorant of that which I'm not.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

and you’re argueing, “what if the CIA funded the wahhabi’s?” as though that contradicts my point.

Is the CIA Wahhabist?

[–] sudo@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No. And no patience for the semantic argument you're wasting my time with when we both agree on the material reality

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

no patience for the semantic argument

I don't think I'd call arming a terrorist group sementics