this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2574 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The European Commission chief said she was “convinced that if the competition is fair” from China, then Europe “will have thriving durable economies”. But she said the “imbalances” caused by state support for Chinese industry leading to cut-cost products threatened jobs in Europe, and that was “a matter of great concern”. “Europe will not waver from making tough decisions needed to protect its economy and security,” she said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] febra@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

God forbid we, the European consumers get to buy cheaper products. What's China doing so right that they can sell stuff for cheaper? What are we doing wrong?

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Massive government subsidies that allow companies to more or less run at a loss for the most part. Its the same playbook as Wallmart and just like Wallmart its a sure bet that those prices will go up once the local competition is wiped out.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Massive government subsidies that allow companies to more or less run at a loss

Where does a government that subsidies a company operating at a loss get the money to fund itself and its unprofitable company? And why is the Chinese economy continuing to grow (often faster than its western peers) if all its businesses operate at a loss?

Its the same playbook as Wallmart

The playbook Walmart uses is to buy cheap disposable foreign imports wholesale and then sell them to western consumers at a 1000% markup, knowing they'll break and need to be repurchased in short order.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

We don't use slave labor, maybe that's what we're "doing wrong".

[–] 7oo7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We shipped all our manufacturing to a country that allows slave labor and now they're beating us.

hey, but you get to deflect from that like you're role models of human rights. until you look into your history, oh wait…

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

First part: looks like that was a mistake. Decentralized manufacturing has always been the future, though.

Second part: we overcame that, didn't we? That's why it's history and not currently happening like in China.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Decentralized manufacturing has always been the future, though.

No, you don't understand, this is actually an incredibly efficient method of producing food for retail consumption.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps we mean different things with "decentralized". What I meant was that it's a bad idea to outsource all your manufacturing to the part of the world where its cheaper. Keep some steel mills, auto plants and chip foundries near where they're consumed. Food production is actually a good example of decentralized manufacturing. I buy mostly locally grown produce, I can literally take a walk and see the wheat which will someday be the bread I eat.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

it’s a bad idea to outsource all your manufacturing to the part of the world where its cheaper

It's a bad long term logistics strategy, thanks to the tail risk that comes with shifts in geopolitical relations. But its heavily incentivized from a short term profit-maximization strategy.

Keep some steel mills, auto plants and chip foundries near where they’re consumed.

So, there's some economic limit on all of these. Steel mills are voracious electricity consumers, which makes them most efficient near cheap hydroelectric or nuclear power stations. Also, steel is heavy, so you'll want the factory near a port, for cheap shipping. Meanwhile, steel consumption is global and generally predicated on where we're doing large construction projects. You can't build a steel mill right next door to a city, just because its going through a construction boom.

That said, that's not really what has happened in the modern global economy. During the 19th and early 20th centuries, our primary method of powering steel mills was through coal consumption. And that gave us a Rust Belt that ran adjacent to the Coal Belt. For decades, the D.H. Mitchell plant in Gary, Indiana was the primary power source of Gary Works, the largest steel foundry in the nation. But the rate of pollution was enormous, ultimately leading to a shut down of the plant in 2010 and half a billion dollars earmarked to help with clean up.

Thanks to high demands for domestic real estate and tighter environmental laws, we've exported an enormous amount of our steel production oversees and rendered some of our largest manufacturing facilities unprofitable. We effectively outsourced our pollution to our colonies (most notably, Gwangyang South Korea, the largest in the world and one of the major feeders to the Japanese automotive industry).

Also, obviously, too, cheap labor. Cheap real estate. Cheaper electricity thanks to depressed domestic consumption. We're pivoting from Chinese exports to Indian and Indonesian exports, because these are the other countries with an enormous pools of cheap labor.

In the same vein, automotive manufacturing moved from the unionized northern midwest to the southwest and Gulf/Atlantic Coast, chasing the lower wages and weaker environmental protections common to these former plantation states.

Chip foundries are an entirely different animal, because of the sizable investment in their construction (north of $1T for a high end modern facility). You can't just make another Taiwan Semiconductor in your backyard, unless you have hundreds of billions of dollars to throw at the project.

Food production is actually a good example of decentralized manufacturing

The US is a breadbasket, so we produce enormous surpluses. A good share of the wheat you're seeing will never end up on your plate, or in your state, or even in your country.

If you look at the impacts of NAFTA on the Mexican agricultural industry, you'll see what I mean. We crashed their domestic corn industry when we flooded Latin America with our cheap excess produce. And, as a result, we created an enormous demand for farm labor north of the border just as we were bankrupting local farms south of the border.