this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59672 readers
2965 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (7 children)

...on students’ school-issued machines and accounts.

These are school issued machines, and like all machines issued by a 3rd party for use under their supervision, they come with monitoring software.

This isn't some dystopian issue, and frankly, students should not be using school issued machines for private chats or photo storage, and should absolutely have their search history monitored while using said devices.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

These aren't necessarily the computers you and I grew up on where they had a dedicated computer lab room for use during class time. These are devices they take everywhere with them, even home. Now imagine some creepy school IT administrator decided to peek on the Webcams of kids while they're on their room?

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I understand the difference between a laptop and PC thanks.

Now imagine if, and hear me out, one didn't bring school hardware home so some "creepy IT administrator" doesn't have access.

"Save the kids" arguments always fall flat on the face when the solution is as simple as leaving school devices at school.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They have to take it home for homework.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, they don't. I am sure the majority have a computer or smart phone at home, and if not libraries exist for a reason.

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

There are more people in poverty without a computer than you realize. Now write me a 5 paragraph essay with correct source citation on your smart phone.

[–] SadSadSatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it's a good thing homework doesn't exist.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Good thing for home computers, smart devices, and libraries eh?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

God the school's response is so sleazy and unapologetic

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 2 months ago

that's how they act when they get caught, remember the Catholic Church

[–] gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

wait schools dont have computer labs anymore???? in ALL my schools and the one im in right now we have them

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

I honestly don't know if they do or don't have. I'd imagine it also varies by region. I just know schools have started giving out laptops to kids to take home if they are needed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (12 children)

Yeah, when i was in school; there were no devices issued to students. We had 'computer labs'. Ie; a room full of computers for student use. There was always one computer for the teachers to use that had a remote-desktop interface monitoring every screen in the room live. They could always see what you were doing, lockout your keyboard/mouse, blank your display.

This really doesn't seem any different.

I could understand outrage if students were require to install this on their own hardware; but school issued devices are under the schools monitoring and control. Always have been.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

I agree that this is no different, and has the same solution: Don't use the schools computers for things that aren't for school and you won't have no problems.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Justify it however you want it but this is a huge over reach esp since we got some shiti 3p vendor involved to middle man this.

I totally trust them not to sell that data after it is "properly anonymized" or "leaked" 🤡

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can you explain to me how a 3rd party putting monitoring software on their own hardware is an over reach?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

School is the counterparty and a state actor with everything that entails sign a poorly negotiated, likely corruption ridden contract with some trust me bro we don't sell data, vendor, ie third party.

Now your child is subject to a contract arrangement that you are not privy too that enables some "dudes" to track your child's usage of equipment.

If you don't see this as an overeach, society has really degraded esp in context of the child abuse issues we are coming grips with.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

School is the counterparty and a state actor with everything that entails sign a poorly negotiated, likely corruption ridden contract with some trust me bro we don’t sell data, vendor, ie third party.

What could be gained by monitoring someones school activity that is not already bought and sold by social media companies that the majority use excessively and daily?

Now your child is subject to a contract arrangement that you are not privy too that enables some “dudes” to track your child’s usage of equipment.

Don't use third party hardware if you are worried about being monitored.

If you don’t see this as an overeach, society has really degraded esp in context of the child abuse issues we are coming grips with.

If you could make a real argument that isn't a personal attack or logical fallacy that would be great.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The article has a pretty convincing argument against it. You should read the whole thing.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

I read the article and it is not in any way convincing.

Sorry to burst your bubble.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why? Can you elaborate on why this is not an issue and kids should be monitored by a 3rd party?

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I already made that clear in my original comment.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No you did not. You just stated that this was the case. I'm asking why that is/should be acceptable.

Why is it normal to put monitoring software on?
Why does a 3rd party need to monitor it?
What are they monitoring that would be considered acceptable?

I honestly ask, because I can't think of any reason.

Or is this similar to "mass shootings are a fact of life"?

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (7 children)

No you did not. You just stated that this was the case. I’m asking why that is/should be acceptable.

These are school issued machines, and like all machines issued by a 3rd party for use under their supervision, they come with monitoring software.

Clear as day. Glad we cleared this up.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 2 months ago

You have some wacked out priorities lol

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This isn't isolated to school-issued equipment. While this article is mostly talking about high school students, this same situation plagues upper education, as well. My roommate was recently taking some college courses from home, and the proctoring software they require installs rootkit-level spyware on his computer and tried monitoring our entire network activity.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That is 100% a different issue.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not really, though. In both scenarios, somebody attending a public school is required to have invasive spyware running on their devices.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The difference between schools installing the programs on their own hardware and installing them on personal devices is stark and I cannot take any argument seriously that ignores this.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're missing the point. Either way, the use of this invasive software is required in order to attend public school.

I cannot take any argument seriously that ignores this.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Either way, the use of this invasive software is required in order to attend public school.

Oh? Who is forcing the use of school issued equipment?

Last time I checked one did not need a school issued device to attend a public school. In fact I would go out on a limb and say the majority are too underfunded to give every student a device in the first place.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You are booming too hard here lol

Jfc

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You are booming too hard here lol

Jfc

I've never heard that phrase. What does it mean?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago