this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59587 readers
5464 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aradina@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"Mustard gas is a weapon of war. There is nothing immoral about employing it as such."

I honestly hope you never have to experience war.

[–] dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Whereas you have no issue with people who agree with you having to experience war?

[–] Aradina@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't know how you got that from my comment.

[–] dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I was being mildly sarcastic, not antagonistic

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 0 points 2 months ago

I can't help but feel that being mildly sarcastic in response to someone's comment is, by its nature, somewhat antagonistic.

[–] Aradina@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago

Sorry, that didn't come across well via text I guess

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Mustard gas is ineffective. That is the actual reason it's outlawed: The opposing force dons gas masks, completely negating the effect, the only stuff that it still kills is collateral damage. That's precisely what happened during WWI: It made everything nastier without actually having an impact on the strategic level.

There's this notion among many people that the Geneva convention is about preventing cruelty or something, not at all: It's about preventing pointless cruelty. Cruelty that does not actually serve a military objective. War is hell, that's already a given.