this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

63134 readers
3762 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (31 children)

On one hand, fuck Musk. On the other hand, internet from space that can't be blocked by governments is a net positive in my book.

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

It's not worth the cost of ruining LEO and the environmental effects of them burning up in the atmosphere

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (19 children)

Oh? What about internet controlled by a billionaire who makes sure his toxic website featuring his version of “free speech” is always available to protect his profits and spread his bullshit?

So much better than the evil government.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

How many people is the billionaire incarcerating?

[–] gnomadic@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

He got his wealth because his parents owned a slave-powered diamond mine.

Also, as he hides his money and doesn't pay taxes the US government is overburdened and one of their tools is relying on prisons for free labor.

Soooo actually quite a lot.

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Good question. He definitely seems like the type that would have a dungeon with captives.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

it can be (and has been) blocked by musk on occasion though.

[–] servobobo@feddit.nl 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How is a billionaire manchild in charge any better, at least a government is accountable to the people.

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

In theory, but how many governments can actually be held accountable? The power imbalance is often too great for the people to hold anyone accountable. In many countries, the system is rigged.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 0 points 5 months ago

Replace government with billionaire and your statement is made even more true.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Controlled by governments or controlled by corpos and the super rich? I say there's hardly an improvement.

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, but through the existence of both options, you can get more plurality than by using one individual option.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 0 points 5 months ago

If we're talking about corporations I can only assume you mean options in how to get fucked.

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Government can throw you in jail.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Corporate throws you on the street to starve.

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

They tried that with me once, but I showed them and got a different job.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

How about internet that can be blocked at the whims of a billionaire? At least government is supposed to answer to the people.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Dictatorships don't answer to the people. It's absolutely a problem that billionaires are controlling the flow of information, but it's much worse for a dictator to do it.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

This is about Brazil, which is not a Dictatorship.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

Brazil’s not a dictatorship though and twitter is breaking their hate speech rules.

Musk is just as bad as most actual dictators with his global reach

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I don't see a difference tbh.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh honey, do you really ignore that a huge chunk of dictatorships do it for the money and most are already billionaires? Why exactly do you think Musk supports the orange cheeto?

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Because the orange Cheeto wants to cut his taxes so he gets more money. Dictators want power, not money. That's why they are famous for blowing it on such exorbitant things. It's just a means to an end. To billionaires the money is the end.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Infynis@midwest.social 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Can't calculate the net yet, since we don't know the gross. He has the capability to cause massive damage with the power he wields. It's already clear that he's incapable of providing an unbiased platform. It needs to belong to the people or it can never be trusted

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)