this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45745 readers
110 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] supertrucker@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Communism works the same way, except the party leaders are the ones on top

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

it demonstrably doesn't, but brainwashed smooth brains will never stop regurgitating this in face of all evidence

[–] Aurora_TheFirstLight@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The problem I understand is that it always end ups in corruption, how do you avoid the corruption of your government

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago

You get rid of the people who would bribe them and then you pay government officials the same as the average worker.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago

What about the Soviet system is more prone to corruption than, say, your standard Western Country? If you can answer specifically what you're concerned about, then we can answer why the Soviet System is better, or has had advancements since the USSR such as the concept of the Mass Line to account for weaknesses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AmericaDelendaEst@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes because workers owning their own workplace and directing activity democratically with no owner class siphoning profits has to work the exact same because......

Oh wait, it doesn't and you're just a fucking moron

[–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Buh b but muh totalitarian Soviet Onion! Muh authoritarian Borf Goria! Muh jorjorwell 8491 Chy Na!

[–] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago

My grandparents were forced to cut onions in the soviet onion! they still remember this when they cry and how stalin was holding the big spoon up to them and demanding more onions! "mr stalin sir too many onions is going to cause flatulence" they screamed but stalin didnt care kitty-cri-texas

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Politicians were paid around the middle of the income scale in the Soviet Union.

Unless you're talking about like the occasional free beer or taxi ride for competently administering your job, which I gotta tell you, however much you think Communist party members did it... Like, have you had a job and talked to your boss and their inter-business negotiations? Holy shit

[–] supertrucker@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If I'm a government official in near complete control of billions in resources, it doesn't matter what I take home in salary, I'm essentially have the power of a billionaire, so long as I keep my bosses happy

[–] TC_209@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago

When asked to criticize communism, liberals will simply describe capitalism.

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago

I honestly don't know what you're talking about. Do you think that a random party guy in Siberia can just say "Nope, the USSR cannot get any oil now" and nothing would be done and he'd be showered in women and coke? Or... Yeah, what the fuck are you talking about?

[–] TC_209@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

"Communism works the same way, except the party leaders are the ones on top," you think to yourself as the crimson Poverty Line flashes upwards across your field of view. "Capitalism is the only system that works." The wind is rushing hard in your ears now; the bottom of the Money Pit is coming up fast. "Besides, they worked hard to swim in the Money Pool, they deser--." Splat.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fascism? Feudalism? What is it that you're implying here?

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fascism is still capitalism so they must meant one of the previous systems.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago

We know that, they may not.

[–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago

Retvrn to feudalism.

[–] TC_209@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago

What other modes of production are currently in use by existing nations?

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 0 points 2 months ago

DuckTales theme plays

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The graph highlights that during Soviet times at least 20% of wealth is in top10% hands, the party leaders and their cronies. If it was truly communism then the top10% would own 10% of the wealth. The party leaders and their cronies owned a disproportionate amount of wealth. Everyone was equal, but some were more equal among others.

It also highlights how the erosion of social services and a lack of a federal government opposing corporate interests is to the detriment of its people.

Authoritarianism is not the way, and neither is crony capitalism in a farcical democracy.

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Top 10% owning 10% of wealth makes no sense as it means perfectly equal wealth redistribution. It is an ultimate goal, but it is not practically achievable. 20% is close enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aria@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 months ago

For all the communism understanders reading this thread: communists still want unequal pay for unequal jobs. The experts and hardest workers collectively owning twice as much as the average workers is acceptable to all of us and desired by some of us.

Our only demand is that you earn the money you generate, everyone earning the same is completely orthogonal and something anti-communists use to steer the conversation and misinform. It would be nice if we were more equal, but it's not what we plan to further with our economic policy. We want everyone to own the means of production, and then you actually gotta do the production to turn that into money.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The graph highlights that during Soviet times at least 20% of wealth is in top10% hands, the party leaders and their cronies. If it was truly communism then the top10% would own 10% of the wealth. The party leaders and their cronies owned a disproportionate amount of wealth. Everyone was equal, but some were more equal among others.

"True Communism" isn't a thing. You don't measure metrics by how purely they adhere to ideology, but by measurable improvements for the Working Class. There is Capitalism, Socialism (where the USSR stood), Lower-Stage Communism, and Upper-Stage Communism. Each of these phases takes time and looks different. Marxism has never been about equal pay, but the Proletariat taking control and working towards Communism. Communism cannot be instantly lept to, and even if it could, it has never been about equal pay.

Additionally, pay was higher for doctors, engineers, professors, and other skilled workers, as is in line with Marxism. It wasn't just Party Members.

It also highlights how the erosion of social services and a lack of a federal government opposing corporate interests is to the detriment of its people.

In what way? In the USSR, Healthcare and Education were free, housing was cheap, public transit was highly developed, and workers had more vacation days and earlier retirement than US workers.

Authoritarianism is not the way, and neither is crony capitalism in a farcical democracy.

Explain what you mean by any of that gibberish.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] IWantToMakeProgress@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago

Distribution of pretax national income (before taxes and transfers, except pensions and unempl. insurance)

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't you know that Stalin owned the whole Soviet Union?!? blob-no-thoughts

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago

He collected it all for himself in one mighty scoop. stalin-comical-spoon

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Make way everyone! The big communism understander has entered the thread

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He skimmed the communist manifesto for 15 minutes then stepped up to zizek-fuck

[–] sweatersocialist@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago

party leaders deserve to top me

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You took highlighting the problems of capitalism as pro-communism? One-way track mind?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

To be fair, this is the Meme community hosted on Lemmy.ml, and OP is a prolific Communist poster.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Communism works the same way, except the party leaders are the ones on top

Therefore the best system is the one that directly rewards the most horridly destructively greedy assholes around without the slightest obligation toward the rest of society!

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's not an either/or situation, there are more alternatives available.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago

Every person who says this will simply describe capitalism with more welfare

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago

Neither communism, nor capitalism. A mysterious third way ((it's fascism)and thus still capitalism))

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Name them, Captain Smug. Tell us about whatever quaint Northern European social democratic paradise that you got excited about after reading about it on Reddit, that compartmentalizes and outsources all the suffering you don't want to know about.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I refuse to believe that someone who calls me 'captain smug' is seriously interested in my opinion.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I refuse to believe that someone who calls me 'captain smug' is seriously interested in my opinion.

I'm not and would prefer you just fuck off, but since you're still here, NAME ONE OF THOSE COUNTRIES THAT HAS A SYSTEM YOU CLAIM IS BETTER.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago

Fair enough, so without any name calling, please name some of those alternatives you mentioned.

[–] AmericaDelendaEst@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago

you can either have private jackasses own everything like petty kings of their little financial fiefdoms, or you can have capital be socially owned and operated without the explicit need for next quarter profit seeking, those are your fucking choices you nerd