Asklemmy

43963 readers

1299 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

If the US stayed out of other countries politics and there were no coups or installation of people favorable to the US what would the world look like? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by Don_Dickle@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

73 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The world would be far more Socialized.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

That's actually the really sad story here.

Every "experimental" regime was either toppled (Chile) or had to align with the USSR (Cuba) to survive. There was never a real attempt at democratic socialist politics without interference from superpowers.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There was never a government at all without interference from superpowers.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Of course, but most governments are allowed to mostly be sovereign.

Sweden or Australia play ball on their own, no need for a coup here.

[–] SLfgb@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lol, what? Australia is a US lackee more than anywhere else. And the CIA was definitely involved in the Whitlam sacking.

[–] MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 months ago

For real, the US committed a coup in Australia with Whitlam. They don't constrain the CIA to just poor countries.

[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Idk, but I feel like Olof Palme (PM of Sweden) def got murdered by the USA for his criticism on the Vietnam War. Or by South Africa for his criticism on apartheid.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

most governments are allowed to mostly be sovereign

Generally speaking, sovereign governments achieve that sovereignty through military might or the inability of would-be rulers to rule them, not by simply being “allowed” to govern themselves by neighbors.

The USA did not invent power.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

My relative likes to mention Nicaragua in the 1970s/80s, but I haven't had the time to read up about it.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

All Socialism is democratic, including Cuba and the USSR. Trying to reform the system along Socialist lines from within the system like Allende is why he sadly failed and was couped by the US Empire.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago

The US tried to invade Cuba as well, and tried to kill Castro, several times. That's ultimately why he did align with the USSR - choosing the bully that's slightly more on your side.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 months ago

This is a non sequitur. It doesn't follow that Allende choosing reform over revolution is what resulted in the US interference. The US has been known to interfere in revolutionary movements as well.

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago

Just imagine how scared and hungry we could all be