this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
511 points (95.7% liked)

Selfhosted

40329 readers
316 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
511
AMD won't patch all chips affected by severe data theft vulnerability — Ryzen 3000, 2000, and 1000 will not get patched for 'Sinkclose' (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 3 months ago by TheHolm@aussie.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
183 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Here we are - 3600 which was still under manufacture 2-3 years ago are not get patched. Shame on you AMD, if it is true.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (5 children)

So I have a 3700x, I've read about the vulnerability but don't fully understand it. How at risk am I?

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

If an attacker gets access to your system, they will be able to ensure you can't get rid of their access

It will persist across operating system installs

However, this requires them to get access first

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Sounds like it's time for an upgrade. Never know what kind of weirdos are out there. Thanks for the information.

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

If they get root or admin they can hack the chip itself.

But minor exploits, nada, no issue, you good. Gotta get root to make it happen.

Problem is if you, as they say, get got, you have no way of knowing if they're in your CPU, and no way to fix if they did -- basically gotta trash it and replace.

[–] mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Not particularly. The exploit requires ring 0 access, if an attacker managed to get that, you are screwed already.

[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

In short, if you're pwned once, you are pwn3d f0r3v#rrrrreeeheehaahaahaa*cough**cough*

These are the kinds of exploits you use to create APT (Advanced Persistent Threats).