this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
639 points (98.5% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2256 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Children will be taught how to spot extremist content and misinformation online under planned changes to the school curriculum, the education secretary said.

Bridget Phillipson said she was launching a review of the curriculum in primary and secondary schools to embed critical thinking across multiple subjects and arm children against “putrid conspiracy theories”.

One example may include pupils analysing newspaper articles in English lessons in a way that would help differentiate fabricated stories from true reporting.

In computer lessons, they could be taught how to spot fake news websites by their design, and maths lessons may include analysing statistics in context.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Konis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"Extremist content" == "not wanting Palestinians to be dehumanized, dispossessed and murdered by Israel"

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No, but studying "hasbara" would make for good practice.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hopefully this is more aimed at far right anti immigration bullshit

[–] li10@feddit.uk 17 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Hopefully it tries to be as neutral as possible, and just gives kids the general tools to spot when something’s fake/exaggerated.

Introducing this sort of thing without trying to be strictly impartial sounds like a slippery slope.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Obviously. But I’m referring to why this was planned, ie. some events led to this being deemed necessary. I’m guessing it’s alt-right radicalisation and post-truth politics, and not the recent Israeli Invasion of Gaza.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Hopefully it tries to be as neutral as possible

No. Forcing a neutral perspective between absurdity and objectively true claims is how we got here.

When one party says that scientific evidence is real and the other says it's a Marxist conspiracy, forced neutralized lends undue credence to the latter.

Similarly, forcibly neutral newsrooms and the neoliberal Starmer government consider it extremist to acknowledge that the fascist apartheid regime of Israel is committing genocide and to call for your country to not supply them with arms, funds, and political cover.

It should try to be as FACTUAL and OBJECTIVE as possible, not chase neutrality when neutrality flies in the face of evidence and the most basic accountability and human rights.

Introducing this sort of thing without trying to be strictly impartial sounds like a slippery slope.

Yeah, they're GOING to consider extremism as anything too far from the interests of the neoliberal and capitalist elite in either direction rather than pursue an evidence-based curriculum of critical thinking like they're pretending.

[–] cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

this class sounds like a malicious teacher could easily introduce bias and radicalize children.. :/

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A malicious teacher would probably already be doing that.

[–] cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

sure, but now they have a reason to talk about this. If a teacher randomly talks about media bias kids are gonna think its weird as fuck and maybe tell parents, but now in this class