this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
19 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38714 readers
2349 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Didn't read the article, but are female wrestlers in the olympics only allowed to weigh 50kg? That seems absurdly light, even for women.

[–] barryamelton@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

She weighted 2 kilos more than allowed the day before, putting her over 50, even almost making it to 53 which would be 2 weight classes over.

They put her in dehydration, diet, "trash bag" running to get all sweat out, a Sauna in the morning of the weight-in (but she wasn't sweating anymore), they removed blood from her, and as a last measure, cut her hair.

She failed.

She needed IV injections right after the moment of the weight-in by the committee. She then was hospitalized and remains hospitalized. It seems that luckily she is fine.

Disqualification is there to prevent countries pushing their athletes through these ordeals, which have long-term consequences on their health.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why wouldn’t you just click the article and skim it real quick?

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Nice try Ricky Astleigh

[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Too many bad experiences with bad cookie banners

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What is a bad cookie banner?! I’ve been a software engineer for 35 years and have never heard of such a thing!

[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The ones that don't let you 'reject all' without going through a thousand submenus

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

There's add ons that rejects them automatically.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Could you please point me in the right direction