this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45731 readers
62 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

lemmy aint that private, and possibly easily scrapable

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As all sites should be. I'm on the internet, mr world wide. When did we expect privacy. Don't put nothing online you don't want the world to know.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I used to think like this, but it's a bit more nuanced./ If you tell people they can't have any expectation of privacy, it's essentially telling people of persecuted minorities that they're not welcome.

Perfect privacy is impossible, but it shouldn't be trivial to violate someone's privacy when their membership of such a community is relevant.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

Reddit isn't privacy-safe either.

I'd put less bots/more legitimate users as a benefit of lemmy instead of privacy though.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To be honest, privacy is not a major concern of mine and wasn't a factor in my decision making at all. Things like messages not being e2e encrypted don't really bother me that much.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

not having e2e bothers me on private 1on1 chat apps.

i don't expect it on lemmy though.

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's as private as you make it. It does not have integrated tracking and/or ad trafficking.

[–] tea@lemmy.today 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah, Lemmy doesn't block you from accessing it via a VPN, for one.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Couldn't it? If an Instance owner so chose?

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Of course it COULD but someone has to modify the code. Boost for Lemmy also shows google ads...

[–] Ghostbanjo1949@lemmy.mengsk.org 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not a code change at all, just a filtering of the traffic from particular ip's and forwarding it to a different page which is all that reddit is doing as well.

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How can you implement Google AdSense banners like that????

[–] Ghostbanjo1949@lemmy.mengsk.org 0 points 3 months ago

I wasn't talking about good AdSense in this case, just the page you are redirected to if you are coming from one of their marked VPN IP addresses. Unless this has changed since the last time I attempted to go to Reddit with a VPN on. But that's the behavior I've witnessed.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] AutomaticUpdates@monero.town 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Wildly_Utilize@infosec.pub 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm assuming he means because federation, even if you delete something its mirrored on other instances

[–] AutomaticUpdates@monero.town 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Sure, but the deletion is also mirrored to the other instances no?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

Under normal circumstances. But there could be federation issues, or someone could run a custom Verizon that just ignores all deletion requests.

I'm unsure if that's considered part of the diligence required in Europe.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago