this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59651 readers
2722 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Reddit says Microsoft’s Bing, Anthropic, and Perplexity have scraped its data without permission. “It has been a real pain in the ass to block these companies.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mint_tamas@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

While I don’t disagree with the general idea, Section 230 would introduce an uncontrollable risk into running any website with user-generated content and would essentially shut them down.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If the site isn't selling data, they wouldn't lose 230 protection. So that would only be a risk for the companies selling their users' data, not your regular forum or something.

That gets really murky though. For example:

  • news sites w/ comment sections - they're profiting from ads and subscriptions, so how much of that has to do with the comments?
  • ecommerce - reviews on Amazon and eBay could be considered advertising for the product. Who's liable, the ecommerce site, the merchant, or the poster?
  • product websites - how much are posted "reviews" considered advertising for the product? There may not be direct sales on the website, but surely someone's review would impact sales elsewhere
  • for-profit services with a discussion forum - these would be on a separate site from the revenue-generating service, but still associated with the brand and thus likely contributing to advertisements for the product

It's a lot more obvious for social media sites like Facebook since user-generated content is the service, but there are a lot of for-profit entities where user-generated content is highly relevant, but not the core service. Would those sites be essentially forced to either moderate or eliminate user interaction?

There's a lot of complexity here.