this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
114 points (98.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43970 readers
658 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

sci-hub and annas-archive

I want to be less reliant on Wikipedia and Google Scholar, but in truth I still use them a lot

[–] linucs@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So you directly read papers on those topics? I tried doing that but I feel it requires a huge amount of background

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

I am not the person you are replying to.

I read a lot of papers and it is hard if you don't have background knowledge of the subject. If it's something I am really interested in, then I will dive deep, if it's not I will probably let it go when I get to the point where I no longer grasp what's being said.

[–] explore_broaden@midwest.social 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why do you want to be less reliant on Wikipedia?

[–] lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] sunzu@kbin.run -1 points 4 months ago
  1. Centralize anything and it will be ruined bubthe regime

  2. Wiki is already under a lot of pressure as is due to be as central as it is. There were rumors of them being under US Security service supervision so how good can it really be and where is it going to go now

[–] BobDole@hexbear.net 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Wikipedia editors are petty and incredibly biased. Start reading the talk pages, especially on controversial articles, and your opinion on Wikipedia’s objectivity will rapidly plummet.

Also, it’s a bit like reddit: you find yourself learning so much about new topics, until you start reading about things you have actual expertise on, and you realize the people writing this shit are uninformed idiots, and, when you try to fix the information, the petty nerds who control it revert your changes and ban you.