this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59651 readers
2690 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gianni@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

We need more nuclear power ASAP

[–] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

There's no such thing as "ASAP" for nuclear power. If you had the permits signed off today, it would take 10 years before a single GWh of new nuclear energy goes to the grid.

Instead, maybe we shouldn't build giant spherical advertising displays?

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

There's no such thing as "ASAP" for nuclear power

Sure there is. It's just that the P stands for "20 years from now."

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Vegas is almost entirely powered by the hoover dam. It's already pretty green as far as energy goes. The question will be where do they get their power from in a few years when lake mead dries up.

[–] HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's not true. The Hoover Dam contributes to Vegas's power supply, but it's nowhere near "almost entirely powered" by the dam, except in Fallout: New Vegas.

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Turns out you're correct. I appreciate the correction.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In addition to the other thing, dams have a dramatic and disastrous impact on the ecology in the immediate area and the entire riparian system they connect to. It's "green" in terms of emissions but they're still harmful and we should be phasing them out for lower impact alternatives as much as possible.

[–] rogue_scholar@eviltoast.org 0 points 4 months ago

Should? Definitely, but let's be realistic, we can barely get people off of coal and oil right now.

In the world we live in, Dams have some of the lowest environmental impact compared to the other places we get our energy.

So we probably shouldn't be trying to phase them out while there are much more severe effects being felt from the other base load facilities.