this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
270 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37747 readers
199 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] luckystarr@feddit.org 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I wonder if a verifiable link to Trump can be made through network (as in graphs) analysis of the people and their connections in that list.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's an official act, so total immunity applies.

What isn't an official act you say? Well that's a good question, but simply put anything that isn't an unofficial act. But then what's an unofficial act I hear you ask? I'll let you know once we have found one, but so far none have been found and it's possible none exist.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Close… the way it was phrased it basically becomes up to the Supreme Court to decide what’s “official”

[–] pythonoob@programming.dev 6 points 4 months ago

He's not currently president, so it wouldn't be an official act, no? The wording doesn't give the president immunity for life. It has to be something done through the office of the president.

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Would that make a difference?

[–] luckystarr@feddit.org 2 points 4 months ago

Doubtful, but, though unlikely, perhaps some media house would want to pick it up?