this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58480 readers
5942 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Welp... There goes physical media...

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

How do SSDs and HDDs compare to optical disks in terms of stability in storage? SSD bits can lose charge over time until a lot of 1s read as 0s, right?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Commercially pressed discs don't last forever, but longer than burnable discs. IIRC, they used to say 50 years for CDs, but in practice, it was a lot less. More like 20 or 30 if you store and handle them nicely. Easily less than 10 if you don't.

Hard drives go bad over time; I don't like trusting spinning platters much over 7 years. They can be OK, but they can suddenly stop working whenever.

SSDs are about the same as spinning platters.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think we are talking about archival storage rather than storage in use. In which case hard drives can last decades.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't trust it that way, no. They might last decades. They also might not. It's a gamble on any single drive, or even a few mirrored drives.

File system also matters. Modern ZFS has error checking that can handle some level of bit rot. Older formats generally don't.

If it's over 7 years or so, I want to get the data off of there.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hard drives break down from use, not from sitting around. We aren't talking about SSDs which while they don't break down will experience data corruption over time. It's not really a gamble at all with mirrored drives.

You're also telling me things I already know. I already use ZFS. I agree that you should be using something with data integrity protection. Though ZFS isn't always what you want for archival purposes.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Magnetic platters absolutely do break down from sitting around. Bearings and other mechanics can also go bad. For those things, a professional recovery operation could still get the data if you're willing to pay, but the drive itself should be thrown out.

Edit: keep in mind that with bit rot, the drive may superficially function just fine. Your data may even be 99% correct. That 1%, however, could cause unrecoverable problems, such as videos that glitch in the middle.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's why you use multiple drives with bitrot protection. Modern SSDs and HDDs have protections against bitrot built in, including internal checksums.

If you are running your hard drives once in a while, then bearing failure isn't really a concern. You probably should be doing that anyway to refresh the data and make sure it doesn't degrade. Regardless people have had 10 year old drives of older spin up first time. It's not likely you are going to have a mechanical issue on multiple drives anyway.

If you refresh an SSD once every couple of years it will last decades.

You keep doing this thing where you presume I don't know about some issue. Rather I know about these things, but they have fairly easy mitigations or are already solved.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago

You keep doing this thing where you presume I don’t know about some issue

Maybe because you way overestimate the reliability of old drives. Yes, 10 year old drives can work. Doesn't mean you should trust them with anything other than getting the data off of it.

[–] tinkling4938@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

SSDs are pretty pricey for video. I use HDDs, mirrored. For some uses I put a SSD caching layer on top to speed up frequent R/W. Using only LVM, no fancy RAID hardware or anything.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

I guess hard drives and SSDs don't count as physical somehow?

Even on a streaming service, the files are stored physically somewhere.

All media is still, technically, physical media.

Even when you stream it locally and don't have access to the file itself, it physically lives in your RAM for the duration of the stream.

[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.run 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

it physically lives in your RAM for the duration of the stream.

It physically lives encrypted in your RAM and only temporarily. Remember TPM exists.

[–] Openopenopenopen@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

storing a movie in RAM does not count as having a physical copy of the movie. While RAM is a form of physical media, the data stored in RAM is volatile and temporary. A physical copy of a movie typically refers to a more permanent and tangible form of storage, such as on a hard drive, SSD, USB flash drive, CD, DVD, or Blu-ray disc.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Still there for the duration. Being encrypted just makes it akin to being inside a locked box. Being in RAM is like it being transferred in an escrow service.

[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.run 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I guess. Technically. I don't usually count encrypted without the ability to decrypt as useful, but, I'll give you the up arrow because technically correct is the best kind of correct.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Thanks, my point is simply just that data is still physical, no matter what.

A document locked inside a box that I personally don't have a key to doesn't make the document inside of it non-existent, just inaccessible to me, personally.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 months ago

No, the data is not physical, it is either magnetic or electric.

Since most people still store their media on hard drives most media is purely magnetic.

In a solid state drive storage chip the data is stored electronicly.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago

Thanks, my point is simply just that data is still physical, no matter what.

Turn off the PC and see how well that no-matter-what applies...

A document locked inside a box that I personally don’t have a key to doesn’t make the document inside of it non-existent, just inaccessible to me, personally.

What's the point of having inaccessible data?

[–] finley@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

the term "physical media" typically refers to portable physical media, such as floppy disks, optical media, and other solutions such as tape.

This term was in wide use before portable hard drives became a thing.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

You are very much missing the point for the sake of a pedantic argument.

Someone else already perfectly illustrated the point in a comment below, so I guess I'm spared the effort.

[–] ChillPill@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

hard drives and SSDs don't count as physical

When was the last time you walked into any store and bought a feature length film or tv show on hard drive or SSD?

Even on a streaming service, the files are stored physically somewhere.

What is your plan when the licence agreement for your favorite series expires on your chosen streaming service and no other streaming service picks up the show?

All media is still, technically, physical media

No one is arguing this. You're making the strawman arguement. The not-so-subtle undertone of the article is clear.

Quoting the article:

The planned job cuts come amid a decline in demand for traditional storage formats such as Blu-ray discs, with streaming services now the norm.

...

The electronics and entertainment conglomerate will also gradually cease production of optical disc storage media products, including Blu-ray discs, according to the sources.

You will not be allowed to legally own tv shows or films and you should learn to like it. As I can tell from many of the other comments here, not many of us are fans of that idea.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

When was the last time you walked into any store and bought a feature length film or tv show on hard drive or SSD?

Well not ANYMORE!!! Not since Best Buy stopped carrying physical media!!!

/s

This isn't a hill I care enough to die on.

I've never bought a series in any format. It's always been piracy and for at least the last 5 years catch and release.

What I mean is, I don't want to keep series in any case.

That said, now I think about it, if I didn't pirate everything then keeping copies of what I'd paid for world feel important

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s just one company, it’s not all the Blu-ray production stopping. I think the last time I bought any Sony recordable media was CD-Rs for my MP3 CD player in the mid 00s.

[–] Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Sony owns the blu-ray format. I'm worried.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They do not own it, they did co-develop it. They’ve never owned it outright.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray_Disc_Association

You thought blu ray sales would just continue forever?

[–] mindlight@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Why are you worried about Sony owning the blu-ray format?

[–] Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

If they're decreasing their production, it could mean that physical media is ending. If so, that fucking sucks because you can't own anything anymore

[–] aniki@lemmings.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They can DMCA the encryption keys and boom -- instead dead format.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

What? No. If I write data to a Blu-ray it’s not encrypted. This comment makes little sense. Sony does not control “the encryption keys”, whatever that means.

[–] mindlight@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You really don't understand how Blu-ray works, do you?

Regarding Blu-ray as a medium for movies: Sony isn't able do that kind of damage.

Blu-ray Association would go bananas:

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

There's still the super-DVDs, or whatever they were called.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I always preferred the rips fork Blu rays though. They had the highest quality video and audio and stuff. This sucks so much =(

EDIT: I just read someone else's comment that although they developed it they don't own it outright so that makes me feel a little better that hopefully other people can still make them.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yep, I'm sure it'll be gone Verbatim.

[–] Dalraz@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago

Take your upvote

[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Its an old code but it checks out 😅