this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
47 points (92.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
269 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello,

I am using qbittorrent for torrenting and my ISP has refused to open up firewall because of fucking "security" reasons. however I can still seed the torrent how is that possible? I mean all the incoming connections should be blocked right? isn't it how firewall works?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 22 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They're probably just using CGNAT.

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's not a firewall though, which is what OP mentions.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 19 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Does OP really know exactly what technology at his ISP is preventing him from "opening ports"?

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe not, but you and I definitely dont, so let's stick to what they're actually saying instead of guessing.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

You commented that it's "super weird and invasive" for an ISP to "firewall" listening ports. It just so happens that CGNAT also has the same effect and is super commonly used right now.

I think I'm good 👍

[–] kionite231@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago

Yes I know what's preventing me from opening ports. I also called my ISP they said we can't open the firewall so the incoming connections will be blocked.

[–] kionite231@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago

It's definitely not CGNAT. I have tested it using traceroute.