this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59587 readers
2940 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)

“If someone is going to try and blackmail me with advertising? Blackmail me with money? Go fuck yourself. Go fuck yourself. Is that clear? Hey Bob, if you’re in the audience. That’s how I feel, don’t advertise.

  • Elon, 2023
[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Careful, you might convince Tesla shareholders to fork over a few more billion to keep the big brained genius motivated.

[–] teletext@reddthat.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"Give me 60 billions this year, or the Tesla stock will lose even of more of its price next year!" -- Elon, probably.

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

That's pretty much exactly what he claimed.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Go fuck yourself! Is that clear?

Can I have a few billion now too?

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If the market were rational that would have been the end of Tesla. It takes some extreme brainletry to turn a huge market advantage into actively losing ground to new entrants. And he is still at it. Being a dimwitted Nazi on Twitter is his top priority. Tesla sales will continue to spiral down the drain.

(Yes, if the market were rational the end might have come sooner, but certainly giving billions to a brainlet actively sabotaging the company should end it.)

[–] Censored@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Remember he is exceedingly wealthy, so he can buy Tesla stock through third parties to prop the price up without alarming investors. No, it's not legal, but we all know the man doesn't give a shit about the law.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I think this should be posted as a comment to every article about this.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's right there in the 4th paragraph of the article itself.

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You mean you actually read the article? Blasphemy!

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Somebody has to do the dirty work.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Someone needs to make a drawing of it because when he originally said it he opened his mouth wide and through his head back like was a literal puppet

[–] Censored@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I'm surprised nobody saw his forked lizard tongue when that happened!

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (12 children)

What's it say? Go find yourself? Go Fill yourself? IDK is this some game you Americans have where you have to guess the word, because the amount of pearl clutching is just too insane in America?

Ah yes that's the amazing freedom of speech Americans are so proud of, except they don't actually have it, they are just indoctrinated to think so.

My god American regulation is so idiotic sometimes!!!

[–] Censored@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Say stupid things, people treat you like you're stupid, stupidly cry about how freedom of speech should prevent people from treating you like the idiot you are.

[–] Electric_Druid@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

You're reading into things way too much here, man.

[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

You think that's bad, get this. In most US states (47), public school students are required by law to recite the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of the United States once per school day, though...for most of those states...students may opt themselves out.

However, in four states (Texas, Florida, Pennsylvania, and Utah), students may not opt themselves out. The school must receive a written statement from a parent or guardian in order to be exempt.

I have taught in Texas public schools since 2005, and I brought this up with an attorney for the teacher organization I joined (not a union as Texas bans collective bargaining for state employees, so our dues are really not much more than lawsuit insurance). He told me that, in the eyes of the state courts, children under the age of eighteen not being yet adults do not enjoy the same right to freedom of speech that adults do. Hence, in the eyes of the courts, a school district would be within their rights to fire a teacher who does not do their part to ensure all students under their purview recite the Pledge during the time it is spoken over the school's PA system (and the Pledge to the Texas state flag, also mandatory), 1st Amendment be damned.

Thankfully, I got a gig teaching in Oregon next year, so I am heading northwest (through the also miserable states of Utah and Idaho unfortunately) and never looking back.

[–] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You don't want to play this game with me, son. Whatever you hurl at me about Oregon, I'll lob back at you something twice as bad about Texas.

I get that Oregon has its hard right people. Hell, most states do. But at least my trans kids gender identity is protected by state law, and my having a trans kid won't result in me being on the governor's fucking hit list.

[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Ah Texas, where children can't make decisions or be held accountable in any way, unless they're brown skinned and can be accused of a crime, then they must he tried as adults and sentenced to life as an imprisoned slave.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

My god American regulation is so idiotic sometimes!!!

Dude, some person made that meme, and that person chose to use asterisks. It's no more complicated than that.

What’s it say? Go find yourself? Go Fill yourself? IDK is this some game you Americans have where you have to guess the word

Apparently our ability to figure out a word from context is pretty much higher than yours though.

[–] MacStache@programming.dev 0 points 5 months ago

What the f*** dude calm down.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Swear words? Boobs? Hell nah

Someone getting shot ten times? PG-13

I think it's hilarious that there are swear budgets for various ratings. I'm pretty sure adults can tell whether a movie is intended for kids or not, and they're the most sensitive to foul language.

I personally choose to not swear, but I watch and listen to plenty of content with vulgar language of all varieties, it really doesn't bother me, so I don't see why it's so taboo in movie ratings...

Welcome to the hypocritical world of Puritan culture.

Some of the earliest British settlers in the US were so extremist that the Church of England kicked them out after they tried to assassinate the king and replace him with a puppet of their own to force their beliefs on the rest of the country.

It was partly these crazies that started the whole sex and bodies=bad and shameful thing in the US that advertisers still believe in today. And swearing is yet another of those weird things. But sex sells, so it's okay to imply it as long as it's selling a product and no other time.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Fuck you, Jack.

[–] razorwiregoatlick@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

What are you talking about? There is no law or regulation requiring that text to be censored. They did it because they wanted to.

[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

“For the children “ …. Like none of them have ever heard bad words…. They must be protected at all cost.

Like a person who likes to grab them by the pussy…

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

There's no regulation, we can and do say fuck without any problem. Some people prefer not to swear either for personal, social, or religious reasons. They chose to self censor not because they had to but because they wanted to. You're reading an awful fucking lot into a random ass image some anonymous user posted in a comment.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

we can and do say fuck without any problem.

Not on public TV you can't. Beep beep beep Fucking idiots.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You can, most networks just decide not to. Broadcast TV (which hasn't really existed for I think more than a decade now) had restrictions about swearing (and other content) enforced by the FCC as it used a public good (RF bands). Cable TV (and now streaming services) are and pretty much have always been unregulated.

TV Networks, being companies trying to make money, opt to self censor so as to appeal to the largest number of viewers, but that isn't anything to do with the government, it's 100% a business decision.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

https://www.tvguide.com/news/features/tv-censorship-nudity-profanity/

swear words that are still taboo on broadcast TV to this day – ended up causing the highest court to rule that the Federal Communications Commission had the authority to regulate what viewers see on broadcast media.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Can confirm, am American and try to avoid swearing, not because there are penalties (friends, coworkers, etc swear all the time), but because I don't like swearing. I find it makes me an angrier person, so I just don't do it.

If you want to swear, go for it, it really won't offend me. But I won't swear in return. Different strokes for different folks.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

There’s so goddamn much to swear about in these fucking times we live in that I really respect anyone who can still hold their shit together enough not to.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Or if you're someone who uses speech to text on your phone. Nearly every system that I've ever used asterisks out everything after the first letter. It can be a lot of extra effort to go back and fill the fucks in. But if there's one fucking thing worth doing fucking right. Fucking filling out those fat fucking fucks is fucking it. It's one of the most fucking versatile words on the planet. It can be a fucking adjective, one of the most versatile verbs no matter what fucked up tense you choose, and even a motherfucking noun.

[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry your phone/ textingapp does what? What app/ phone do you use? Ive never encountered or even heard about that

[–] mzesumzira@leminal.space 0 points 5 months ago

They're not talking about texting apps, it's keyboards and speech to text engines that often have a profanity filter, which usually is on by default.

I disable it on everything every time I change phones or format, but not everybody tinkers with settings.

You probably default to a keyboard without profanity filter.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yes. Elon should approach his advertisers on bended knee -- after changing Twitter back to Twitter, and creating a proper moderation system that filters out neonazis and Russian AI Trump-bots.

Oh, George Washington rode the waves
Abe Lincoln wore his hat with praise
Thomas Jefferson, the sandy king, and
Teddy Roosevelt, the beach-hiking thing
Barrack Obama, surfing gracefully
Historical presidents at the sea!
-- @hisvault.eth

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

Calling out Bob Iger in particular was the cherry on top.

Massive hubris.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 0 points 5 months ago
  • Elon with TSLA stock at 2023 levels, lol
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Musk sheepishly suggested that he didn't mean "advertisers as a whole."

"Advertisers have a right to appear next to content that they find compatible with their brands," he told ad giant WPP CEO Mark Read during an interview on Wednesday. "What is not cool is insisting that there can be no content that they disagree with on the platform."

How is that “not cool?” I don’t understand how he can possibly object to a company spending their advertising dollars wherever they damn well choose to. He repeatedly makes it clear that he feels entitled to their budgets. There is zero basis for that. I truly cannot fathom how he can be so dense about this.

[–] Metacortechs@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He can object because he's decided that's what is right. Literally nothing else matters.

The piece of shit that used to own my company is like this. His decision is correct and gospel, and if you don't agree or if it's provably false you are wrong. And it's your fault you are wrong, because he has decided it to be correct.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Right but the bubble of rightness you speak of is usually only assumed to include the company staff. Really powerful CEOs have their board inside the bubble too, or even public investors. But Elon thinks the customers work for him too. That’s really beyond the pale.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Wowow! That was so long ago! Literally dozens of weeks ago! I’m sure this full-blown narcissist has seen the error of his ways and changed his mind. Surely.