this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59587 readers
2940 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I'll be curious to see where this ends up going, as I doubt the community will take this lying down.

The few times I've had to go without an Ad blocker, I've seen just how bad the Ads have gotten - they're almost the same as regular TV Ad breaks now! ... And then YouTube Premium is just not a good deal in my eyes, £12.99 a month is an awful lot to pay just to not see Ads.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You're not paying to not see ads. You're paying for the content on the platform. You can pay either by watching ads or by paying for premium.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Content creators get nothing from a subscription To YouTube premium.

You’re not paying for the content, you’re paying for and-free access to the content.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Content creators get nothing from a subscription To YouTube premium.

This is not true. If you're a free user they're getting a share of the ad-revenue. If you're a premium user they're getting share of the membership fee. The more videos you watch from a creator the more they earn.

Source

Also. Do you have any idea how expensive it is to run a video hosting platform? Especially at the scale of YouTube. There's a good reason Lemmy doesn't have videos.

[–] PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

There’s a good reason Lemmy doesn’t have videos.

peertube exists. it's activitypub. lemmy is the reddit-like interface to activitypub. but the fediverse definitely has video. it even has live streaming through OwnCast (though i think peertube has livestreaming scheduled to be implemented as well)

edit: hey i just found a movie station!

https://movies.ctbperth.net.au/

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

I'm not informed enough to know how peertube works but running it is not free either. Nor is running a lemmy instance. Lemm.ee for example has a limit even on the size of images you can upload despite the fact that hosting images is orders of magnitude less bandwith and storage requiring than videos.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I don’t care. I don’t wanna watch ads, ever. The point is, YouTube will never be able to stop ad blockers. They can try, and the only ones who get hurt on the content creators.

Edit: and whining, “boo-hoo for the trillion dollar megacorp!” Isn’t going to elicit any sympathies

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It is expensive, but it's hard to quantify that expense for a cloud provider like Google. They're liable to use their market prices for cloud services to justify the "cost" when they want to make it look more expensive than it is. They're already building a cdn for all their other services as well, so YouTube's cost is baked into that.

Reddit, by comparison actually pays for cloud hosting for all it's video services and so pays out the ass.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

TIL I should be posting hundreds of AI-generated long form video essays to reddit.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Serving the videos is where they really get hit, not necessarily storing them.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

This is not true, creators get paid for Premium user views.

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They get money from premium views. I believe they get significantly more per premium views than an add view.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

This is true, no matter what ElevethHour and their downvote brigade want you to believe.

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

They get the most money by just donating trivial amounts to their Patreon. That should be the standard. I assure you $5 one time to a creator is more than they'd ever make off you with Ad revenue.

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ads will probably stop me from watching YouTube completely. The huge surge of ads at some point was what stopped me from using Instagram.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Unstoppable ads are what stopped m from using twitch.

[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

The occasional times I need to use Twitch I either VPN to Romania or use S0undTV.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The majority of of people using it will most definitely take it lying down as they're most likely not tech savvy enough to install a browser extension on a laptop if the only thing on the page was a large red install button.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 0 points 5 months ago

That's why I specified the community, as in the more tech savy folks that would care about this, because I know that the wider public is surprisingly tech illiterate

[–] bitflag@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

And then YouTube Premium is just not a good deal in my eyes, £12.99 a month is an awful lot to pay just to not see Ads.

I think this includes YouTube music (at least in my market it does) which makes it fairly good value for money if you already subscribe to a music streaming app.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh, bundling. I thought societies were pleased to get rid of cable bundling, why is it coming back?

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Because Netflix didn't dismantle the capitalism machine.

Capitalism can never fully disrupt itself. It's always cyclical. If bundling eventually made it more money, then it will eventually return. If the response to that is to innovate something that gets around that form of bundling, then that "disrupts" the market, in the short term, only for the market to settle back to bundles.

Because as long as the idea makes more money in a capitalistic society, it will never die.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

But you can listen to YouTube music for free too, no?

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago
[–] bitflag@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think so, but with ads just like the free tier of Spotify.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Does Ublock Origin not work for it anymore? And for phones, there are alternative apps - I use InnerTune.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I use ublock on my phone as well. I set it up to play through FF and never access the YouTube app. Did it for my gf when she complained of ads, and then did it for my self it was so easy.

I don't remember the last time I saw an ad between us.