this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58480 readers
4428 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (10 children)

I'm sorry, why the fuck aren't these street legal in more than half of the states? The article says something about safety, but these are street legal all over Europe where we have stronger safety regulations.

Also there's something I can't put my finger on about the journalist choosing a hero image of the van losing its cargo.

[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Speed restrictions.

Kei trucks were designed for use in dense Japanese cities, which is why they also work in European cities. They are nimble but have a low top speed. You're not going 70 mph around a street corner for instance.

It would work in places like NYC for the same reasons, but remember that most of the USA is suburban or rural. You need vehicles that are capable of going fast if you're going to get on a highway.

A possible workaround is to have a separate class for these, like mopeds or scooters, which are road legal but are not highway legal.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In Illinois, at least, your motorcycle has to be 150cc to ride on the interstate. A Chinese GY6 scooter might be able to do 50MPH with a tailwind. You'd get killed on the interstate on one of those, yet, fully legal to do it.

[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You'd get killed on the interstate on one of those,

You guys in Illinois are crazy though. I learned very quickly how much that 55 MPH limit is a guideline and not a hard limit.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Depends on what part of Illinois you’re talking about, I’m from southern Illinois and we typically only go about 60/65 on highway and 75/80 on interstate. Chicagoans will honk and pass me while I am doing 80 through 2 lane construction zones, literally happened a couple months ago as I was driving to O’Hare for an overnight flight

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

A long, long time ago, I used to drive from Kenosha, WI, to Wilmette (and later Northfield), IL, for work, down I-94, in a 1986 Honda CRX. Up until about Tower Rd., I was doing 105MPH every day, and people were passing me like nothing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

That work around is what most states that explicitly legalized kei trucks have done, they can't enter roads over 55mph. It's a reasonable concession, you probably don't want to take one over 50mph anyway.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They don’t meet the us safety standards. It could mean a lot of things like lacking 5mph bumpers, air bags, abs, etc.

Doesn’t mean they aren’t safe.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Doesn’t mean they aren’t safe.

At just 31MPH a Kei truck gets absolutely clobbered in front offset and side impact safety tests, even against small vehicles like Smart Cars and the old (small) Ford Rangers. Like don't bother calling an ambulance just the morgue kind of clobbered.

Kei trucks are neat vehicles and I'd like to have one but scientific testing shows that they are not safe.

[–] Mmrnmhrm@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

yet people are killed / injured on european road at much smaller rate than in the US. the best US state is less safe than even the worst canadian province (and canada isnt even good). the US treats its roads like a car crash derby so it needs “higher standards”, but that approach is provably terrible. not only vehicules are huge and wasteful, but the roads remain horribly unsafe as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Where exactly are these legal in Europe? I've never seen one, we have small-ish trucks (that get bigger every iteration) but not this tiny, that I know of. Pretty sure they're not legal in my country at least.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

They're definitely legal, they're just not sold. I've seen them, but they're generally sold by importer companies that sell JDM vehicles. A business in my area has a fleet of kei pickups

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Different crash standards in US and Europe. Most companies don't even bother getting cars tested (designed?) in both because the market demands are so different.

[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This has got to be the most incorrect comment in the thread

Edit - ah wait no, Check this fuckin idiot

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Probably because it's not safe to drive them around giant pickups who can't see over their hoods

[–] blazera@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

This is how we got in this mess, an arms race of trying to feel safe around larger and larger hunks of metal on the road. Americans just have to endanger everyone else for their own peace of mind.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (8 children)

How's that different from driving a car roughly the same size?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Ya. Everything’s expensive, so people buy the cheapest thing [with four wheels]. I don’t want folks on the lower end of the socioeconomic spectrum to think these are a safe option.

If(?) a ‘90s Honda sedan is safer but the Kei is new and looks cute, for the same price many will choose the less safe option.

Eight Californians die on our roads every day here and I can’t wait for some solutions. I really do empathize with everyone you readers care about (no oil companies, no just-for-funsies-truck manufacturers) - I hate the thought of crumpled and crushed human bodies.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Europe and Japan all have freight trucks driving around, so I don't buy that. The fact that many states won't allow these is American truck manufacturing protectionism, nothing more. It's the same reason you can only get a 3/4 or 1 ton truck from Ford, Chevy, or Ram (chicken tax).

[–] YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

It's all about the chicken tax.

The front view from a freight truck is better than that of a f150.

[–] jaspersgroove@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Cab over engine freight trucks with excellent visibility, not jacked up chevys where your view of the ground starts 20 feet in front of you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

European road safety regulations are significantly weaker than those in the US and Canada.

[–] Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You've never been to Europe, lol.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’ve lived in several European countries and also worked in compliance departments for auto manufacturers. You have zero clue what you’re talking about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Pretty sure that's not the case, had a little Google and it seems like I'm right, but I'm open to being corrected if I'm wrong or misunderstanding what you mean. Here's evidence to support my claim:

https://etrr.springeropen.com/articles/10.1007/s12544-014-0131-7

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457518300034

https://irpj.euclid.int/articles/the-dissimilar-determinants-and-outcomes-of-road-safety-in-the-united-states-and-the-european-union/

[–] MeatStiq@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Here in the states we have ~~legal corruption~~ lobbyists which the auto manufacturers pay to keep cheap vehicles from being used. And then the lawmakers claim safety concerns as the reason.

[–] Addv4@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

They're not really safe. They are generally front heavy, so there is a risk of rolling forward, no crumple zone safety stuff, more often than not the front suspension is under the seat and if that breaks it would shoot up into the cabin, and on top of everything they are pretty slow. They have more in common with an off road Polaris than a traditional truck, which is to be expected because they were mostly designed to be farm trucks. I'd much rather be in an older s10 than a kei truck in the event of a crash (and s10's aren't very safe). I think I lot of why they are so popular these days is because there aren't really any light trucks anymore, and these are an alternative.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'd still own one if they were just banned on highways. The risk is probably pretty low on low speed city streets, where these would be most useful.

[–] Addv4@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I actually considered it when I last looked for a new vehicle but besides being too expensive for what they are ($10k for a 90s cheap truck) they made a lot of compromises on them. For instance, on most the struts and springs are right under the seats, so if that breaks it would come right up into your legs. If the truck is rust and going over bumps, that is a non zero possibility.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

We should take a step back: why do we need all those safety standards in the first place? The reason is that we have such gigantic vehicles in the first place, and smaller ones simply cannot be safe on the same road. Level that all down and suddenly Kei cars are as safe as they need to be.

[–] Addv4@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Not really. I compared it to an older Chevy s10 for a reason. Those were relatively small trucks that, while not always the most reliable, are still a pretty decent option for most people. Kei trucks are a smidge smaller, but are better on gas and frankly less safe. I don't think this is a "get rid of bigger vehicles and this goes away" but of a "Kei trucks aren't really any safer than an off-road golf cart and current regulations allows them on the road". We need the safety regulations so less people die on Auto accidents, and kei trucks don't really have to comply with even the basic ones.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)