this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59651 readers
2646 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cringe2793@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Maybe. I'm sure there's more than one reason. But the negativity people have for AI is really toxic.

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

is it?

nearly everyone I speak to about it (other than one friend I have who's pretty far on the spectrum) concur that no one asked for this. few people want any of it, its consuming vast amounts of energy, is being shoehorned into programs like skype and adobe reader where no one wants it, is very, very soon to become manditory in OS's like windows, iOS and Android while it threatens election integrity already (mosdt notibly India) and is being used to harass individuals with deepfake porn etc.

the ethics board at openAI got essentially got dispelled and replaced by people interested only in the fastest expansion and rollout possible to beat the competition and maximize their capitol gains..

..also AI "art", which is essentially taking everything a human has ever made, shredding it into confetti and reconsstructing it in the shape of something resembling the prompt is starting to flood Image search with its grotesque human-mimicing outputs like things with melting, split pupils and 7 fingers..

you're saying people should be positive about all this?

[–] Cringe2793@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You're cherry picking the negative points only, just to lure me into an argument. Like all tech, there's definitely good and bad. Also, the fact that you're implying you need to be "pretty far on the spectrum" to think this is good is kinda troubling.

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

I didnt say you need to be autistic to like AI, I said the only person I know who is enthusiastic about AI is on the spectrum.

I listed half a dozen things off of the top of my head that are cearly negatives. What good things are coming out of this?

[–] mriormro@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Being critical of something is not "toxic".

[–] Cringe2793@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

People aren't being critical. At least most are. They're just being haters tbh. But we can argue this till the cows come home, and it's not gonna change either of our minds, so let's just not.

[–] mriormro@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You simply choosing to ignore valid criticisms and hand waving them away as people "just being haters" does not make it so.

We're not arguing. I'm just pointing out your own bias.

[–] Cringe2793@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Amazing. You do love hand waving things away, don't you

[–] Cringe2793@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Nah I just can't be bothered to discuss with closed minded people

[–] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You sound like my former boss. He once told me "I hate arguing with you, because you usually win." I was too stunned to say anything in response, but of course a minute later it occurred to me I should have said "you could try not being wrong" or something like that...

[–] Cringe2793@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Haha you can put it however you like. It's just that y'all don't really have any bearing on my life, so convincing y'all won't really make any difference. I'd rather save the effort.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

For the record I agree with you. Disengaging is 90% times the better response to online "arguments". Which there's there's far too many of for no reason anyways.

Also, I was just messing with ya with the whole hand waving thing, it was meant as a kind jab.

Anywho, likensub!

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

Sure man. Whatever.