this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
368 points (93.4% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35563 readers
848 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Raising this dead article as Microsoft now delivers extended support pricing details for those who choose not to migrate to the newer version of Windows. The one they were told they'd not ever have to migrate to

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pacoboyd@lemm.ee 70 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (12 children)

I'll probably get down voted to oblivion, but I remember EVERYONE had the same "I'll never move" rhetoric with Windows 7, and before that Windows XP. Ya'll eventually move.

I've moved 3 of my 6 windows boxes from 10 to 11 and it's not that much different. I just debloat the stuff I don't want and move on. Even that isn't different, ya'll remember nlite? We've been ripping crap we didn't want out of the OS for as long as I can remember.

Hell, I even remeber getting doublespace.exe off my old dos 5 disks so I could use it on my dos 6 and Windows 3.1.1 install. People who use Windows are just more used to tearing down what they don't want rather than building up what they do (*nix). Is it harder these days...marginally...is there more to remove...yup. But it's still the same crap we've always done.

[–] DharkStare@lemmy.world 59 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The difference this time is that my computer literally can't run Win 11. I'm not throwing away a perfectly good PC just because of Win 11's hardware requirements.

[–] tuxrandom@kbin.social 29 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Especially not for such enragingly artificial hardware requirements. Any computer able to run 64-Bit Win XP would probably run Windows 11 just fine if Microsoft hadn't decided to build instructions that only work on recent CPUs into the kernel specifically to make it not run on older hardware.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Assuming Microsoft is acting nefarious here, what would there motivation be to lock out older hardware?

[–] YerbaYerba@lemm.ee 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

To sell new hardware with new OEM windows licenses

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 months ago

Or in future be able to block programs they don't like or that are modified in a way they don't like. Or be like android and lock it down so you can't be admin without losing ability to use applications

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

They could probably reduce the support needed for drivers that support said older hardware. I would imagine some of those drivers are probably hard to maintain. That’s my guess anyway.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you still need/want to run Windows 11, you can download the ISO from Microsoft, and burn it to an USB Stick using Rufus.
Rufus lets you disable all those requirements.

But I wouldn't count on it working forever. Any Update could break your OS, cause Microsoft expects you to install it on conforming hardware.

[–] valkyre09@lemmy.world 36 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If I wanted an operating that could break from a regular update I’d just install Arch!

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

What breaks Arch is people thinking pacman -Syu is enough to keep it running.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/System_maintenance

[–] Klanky@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

So I WAS on 11 until all of the sudden my computer refused to boot with the special hardware thing enabled. Had to downgrade to Windows 10 and the mobo manufacturer's response was 'try replacing every other part in your PC'...sorry I don't have the money to have spare parts of everything just lying around. 10 works perfectly fine, and it'll give me an excuse to upgrade my mobo in Oct 2025. :-)

[–] warm@kbin.earth 25 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Maybe to 12, a lot of people stuck with 7 until 10, because 8 sucked. A lot of people stuck with XP because Vista sucked. A lot of people are sticking with 10 because 11 sucks. In history, Microsoft has had a usable OS every other.

If 12 is shit, perhaps Linux will finally get its day.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Windows 11 is essentially just 10 with a theme over it. 90% of the hate for Windows 11 also applies to 10. The only real new thing is the hardware requirements.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

11 has ads, AI and other annoyances crammed in.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Windows 10 had ads from the start. That was the biggest complaint about it on release, and the fact that people hate 11 and are ok with 10 on that baffles me.

And somewhat coincidentally the bing shit was added to 10 before 11 got it.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Windows 11 is so much worse. Windows has always been problematic but now Microsoft is forcing AI, Edge, One drive and teams. You can't use up to date Windows without the BS. Windows 10 is now just as bad as Windows 11

That's what happens when one company has pretty much exclusive control over most consumer machines.

[–] pacoboyd@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, not really. Even if it was it is still annoying to do and is confusing for most people.

[–] pacoboyd@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the "not easily done" crowd saying "just move to Linux". Lot easier to remove those items than for most folks to learn a whole new platform.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Nail on the head.

Also, I've been msconfig'g and removing programs from Windows for the past 20+ years. It's always been something you just do in Windows.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Not really. W11 doesn't pass my company privacy and security certification (we deal with a lot of sensitive data). A lot of stuff, specially the intrusive AI hooks into the filesystem cannot be removed. I mean, you can remove them to the point that a user won't notice or think that the AI was there. But there's a bunch of under the hood shit that still makes it a liability. Even just disabling the Bing AI BS on Edge doesn't actually remove it, it just makes it invisible to the user. Just like OneDrive and Teams cannot be actually removed, they just exist and act out of the user eye, but we actually pay to use those so the evaluation is different. But the AI crap is not transparent enough to even be audited by an independent third party. We are already a bit weirded out by Teams auto transcript that just listens to all chats and all meeting at all times. But that shit is so bad that it never gets a single word correct. We received proof that the transcript runs locally and never leaves our sharepoint server, so we tolerate it. MS is just crap all around when you actually need to be secure or private.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I wish. Most stuff I used to do now has extra clicks required, the right click 7z panel, the process monitor kill process button (now hidden on a submenu on a right-click), and I can't put the taskbar vertically!!! I use two monitors, I'm used to having it on the right monitor, on the left vertically. The reasoning was that not many people move their taskbar and while that might be true, after some regex modifications, the only thing that's completely broken if you put the taskbar vertical was the news button pop-up (it didn't align correctly), which is basically ads, and I'm completely against them gutting features because their ads need extra work (not that much work, just work).

Besides that, having a fat suggested apps bar on the windows menu that takes 30% of the space is a thing again, which is ad space too. Great

Anyway, KDE is cool. Thanks Microsoft, I would have persevered if it wasn't for the vertical taskbar, now I'm happier.

[–] pacoboyd@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Classic right click menu is a regkey away.

Classic control panel is still there too.

I have 4 monitors, task bar on all of them, not sure why yours doesn't. Apps even go to the appropriate task bar per monitor when minimized.

Suggested apps size can be minimized.

They only show you "ad" apps on first boot, otherwise gone once you remove them.

Me thinks you just like to complain lol

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 7 months ago (7 children)

I really don't think it's reasonable to be needing to mess with the registry to get basic behaviour that you want. It's just the same shit that people accuse Linux of needing to use the terminal all the time except in windows flavour.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

For your first two points, I'm kinda against having to fight against the system, at that point I prefer to work alongside the system with Linux, but W/E. In any case, I would have fixed these if the taskbar wasn't impossible. No I'm not going to install a 3rd party program to fix the taskbar.

About the 4 monitors, it's cool that you like having 4 taskbars, wasting tons of space. I don't. I'm not asking that, I'm asking having a single taskbar vertically. It's one of the big complaints I've read about win11, not being able to have vertical taskbars on the side of the monitor.

I've not seen a way to remove the "recommended" space in the start menu, and I'm sorry but any recommendation I didn't agree with is an ad. You might think otherwise, and that's cool, but I don't like ads in products I pay.

That last sentence wasn't very nice, especially considering that you didn't understand one of the complaints (the taskbar thing).

Anyway, happy that you are enjoying win11 and I wish I was, but yeah, I don't fancy paying for less features.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's no reason 7zip can't be in the default right click menu other than laziness. Devs have had the option to add stuff to that menu since the start, but it wasn't until 2023 that they really started actually supporting it. Nanazip is 7zip with a Windows 11 UI and it supports the menu.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Cool, as stated though, I would have persevered if it wasn’t for the vertical taskbar being removed. Oh you can't have the main taskbar only be shown in the secondary monitor either. Look, I get that they are implementing features and apps are adapting and all that, but these features missing make it feel like a regression, alongside weird interactions with sound volumes I'm having in my work laptop where even if I change the volume, it gets lowered again and I have disabled all the features that let apps take control, dunno.

I'm a developer, I get that beginnings are kinda rocky, but that's what I expect from a FOSS product, not a paid one. Is it weird that I feel that it's unreasonable to get out of beta with all these kind of issues? To suggest very aggressively to upgrade? Specially when the upgrade was free for all the win10 users? It's not like they had a big monetary incentive to push the release forward.

Win10 might have had tons of security holes and the cortana stuff, but it was really configurable, you could format the start menu as the win8 panel, as the simple win7 panel, or as the hybrid win10 panel natively, you could move the taskbar to wherever you wanted, across multiple screens, configure it as you liked natively. Now you need to install 3rd party stuff to emulate half baked imitations of those features, and if security holes appear in those products microsoft won't fix them. Win 11 feels way too restrictive, in a way that I feel like it takes a lot of decisions not for me, but from me, and I really dislike that.

Yeah, I know that the win10 panels can be re-enabled through the registry, but until how long will they be patched? They are clearly deprecated.

Anyway, sorry for the rambling, I'm happy that you like the product.

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 6 points 7 months ago

W11 is also just slower than W10 for no reason. The file manager especially is quite slow.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Haven't kept up with it, but that certainly wasn't the case on release and I still don't think it's as functional as 10. I have only used it on a family laptop and had trouble simply connecting a printer, it drives you even further away from useful settings than 10 does.

Theme is subjective of course, but I much prefer 10 myself.

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

And then there's weird people like me that prefered Vista and 8.1 over 7 and 10.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ya'll eventually move.

Yeah, I moved to Linux.

[–] pacoboyd@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Me thinks Lemmy isn't great at representing the larger world. Lots of tech folks here.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Yes, it's SysAdminWorld for sure, and I'm reminded of it on any post that's even remotely tangentially related to Windows.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

I remember EVERYONE had the same “I’ll never move” rhetoric with Windows 7

I did eventually move... to Linux. Windows 7 was the last version of Windows I've had installed on any machine I own.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 10 points 7 months ago

Honestly 11 was finally the push I needed to try Linux as my main driver. Gaming finally got to the point where I could switch. The only thing they made in 11 that was beat was AutoHDR. Everything else was annoyance to me.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Dude stop reminding me how old I am. I just discovered arthritis bones that my favorite grandma decided to give me this morning.

[–] pacoboyd@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why is windows still bloated after all these decades?

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Did you expect them to remove features over time?

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

They removed the Quick Launch toolbar in Win11 - main reason I didn't even consider moving.

I have just recently discovered a way to bring it back, but it's not exactly optimal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I moved away, but not to newer windows.

[–] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago

I completely forgot about doublespace and all the XX-DOS stuff was when I was a teen. Had fun messing around with DR-DOS and wish I would have found Linux back then.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

I never upgraded from Win 7. I used in untill Steam stopped its support and now my gaming rig runs on Linux.

[–] toddestan@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Well, if you're sticking with Windows, you really have no choice. The sun is rapidly setting on using Windows 7 as a "daily driver" - a lot of new software doesn't support it and the older versions that work on Windows 7 are getting less and less viable. Windows 8 is in the same boat as Windows 7. Windows 10 goes out of support next year, but you've probably got to 2028 or maybe 2029 before you really have to move.

I ended up riding Windows 7 pretty much to the bitter end. Steam dropping Windows 7 support last December was it for the last Windows box. Everything now is running Linux.