this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
203 points (90.8% liked)

Nintendo

18490 readers
81 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date

|

Mario & Luigi: Brothership | Nov 7 Donkey Kong Country Returns HD | Jan 16, 2025 Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition | Mar 20, 2025 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
slimerancher@lemmy.world
CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.world
CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemdro.id
picandocodigo@lemmy.world
203
The Pokémon Company Announces It Will ‘Investigate’ Palworld IP And Assets (www.forbes.com)
submitted 10 months ago by Stovetop@lemmy.world to c/nintendo@lemmy.world
121 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 113 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It's been advertised forever. If there was a case, Nintendo lawsuit-happy lawyers would have taken them down by now. It was never a secret their design shared aesthetic with Pokemon.

[–] Maven@lemmy.sdf.org 50 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Reading the article explains that it's not that their aesthetic is shared, it's that some of the models are extremely similar to S/V models, beyond the likelihood of coincidence, and Nintendo plans to investigate if it's coincidence or actual asset theft.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

Reading the linked article? You are asking the impossible.

[–] Dalek_Thal@aussie.zone 24 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That was disproven several times - the guy who claimed it even admitted he'd altered Palworld's assets to show that supposed 'similarity'

[–] HandBreadedTools@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do you have a source for that? This is the first I'm seeing that the claims were fraudulent.

[–] Eccitaze@yiffit.net -3 points 10 months ago

The guy apparently rescaled the models to make them similar in size, which, idk if I'd call that altering

I still think it's kind of a BS claim though

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Source? Or is this a "dude trust me"

[–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

Screenrant Article here from a day ago. It does still state that Nintendo intends to investigate, but most of the stolen/copied asset claims have been refuted or rescinded. With the main "they stole assets" person admitting they fabricated the proof because they hate how Palworld glorifies animal abuse (which is extremely ironic to me because no one had a problem when Pokémon was cockfighting for children)

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de -2 points 10 months ago

No they are not.

[–] ItsAFake@lemmus.org 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, if one of the most litigious gaming companies out there hasn't filed a suit against them, then I think they might be ok, unless they can somehow prove parts of assets were used.

The closest Nintendo has gotten to legal stuff was against a modder for Palworld who used Pokemon and put the mod behind a paywall and I'm pretty sure if they didn't charge they might have been left alone maybe.

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 17 points 10 months ago

Nintendo is incapable of leaving anything alone.