this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
203 points (90.8% liked)

Nintendo

18490 readers
21 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date


|


Mario & Luigi: Brothership | Nov 7 Donkey Kong Country Returns HD | Jan 16, 2025 Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition | Mar 20, 2025 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 113 points 10 months ago (10 children)

It's been advertised forever. If there was a case, Nintendo lawsuit-happy lawyers would have taken them down by now. It was never a secret their design shared aesthetic with Pokemon.

[–] Maven@lemmy.sdf.org 50 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Reading the article explains that it's not that their aesthetic is shared, it's that some of the models are extremely similar to S/V models, beyond the likelihood of coincidence, and Nintendo plans to investigate if it's coincidence or actual asset theft.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

Reading the linked article? You are asking the impossible.

[–] Dalek_Thal@aussie.zone 24 points 10 months ago (4 children)

That was disproven several times - the guy who claimed it even admitted he'd altered Palworld's assets to show that supposed 'similarity'

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ItsAFake@lemmus.org 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, if one of the most litigious gaming companies out there hasn't filed a suit against them, then I think they might be ok, unless they can somehow prove parts of assets were used.

The closest Nintendo has gotten to legal stuff was against a modder for Palworld who used Pokemon and put the mod behind a paywall and I'm pretty sure if they didn't charge they might have been left alone maybe.

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 17 points 10 months ago

Nintendo is incapable of leaving anything alone.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de 100 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If Nintendo would invest the money they pump in DMCA takedowns and lawyers in their games instead,
then perhaps they would have a chance to make something equally good as Palworld.

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 61 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nintendo does, GameFreak and The Pokemon Company on the other hand..

[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 50 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I submit Nintendo's online service as evidence that, that is not true in the least bit. MK8, Smash, Splatoon 3, all of them have atrocious online. Pokemon Unite using Tencent's online services runs circles around anything Nintendo has offered with online being a major factor and that's on same hardware.

Nintendo has their IP and they take extremely good care of it. No argument there. But holy shit is Nintendo's online service absolute trash. I will always have something Nintendo because I must always have my Animal Crossing, but holy fuck, let's not kid ourselves about Nintendo's online stuff. Anything that's using Nintendo's servers for match making or their network stack for connectivity is just garbage.

I will always love a good Mario, Pikmin, or Animal Crossing but Nintendo clearly isn't investing a single cent into online anything. And that is just my 2¢.

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

I agree with you on that but it's a bit inaccurate to say them not pumping money into their games is not true in the least bit. It's just their online services which are a disaster. Most of their games are still pretty damn great and it shows.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 94 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

its ridiculous the number of fucking nintendo stans that are crying for nintendo to do something about Palworld.

Nintendo is the most litigeous company in the world (They fucking DCMA'd themselves for fucks sake) , If Palworld violated anything and Nintendo had actual opportunity to sue for anything.. They'd have done so long ago.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 35 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They fucking DCMA'd themselves for fucks sake

Oh, I want to hear the story behind this.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

they had a complete meltdown when some people got tears of the kingdom early via shipping mishaps, so went on a massive rampage of DMCA notices to take down everything mentioning it. Youtube Videos, News Articles (that contained nothing but nintendo released official screen shots/images), and their own twitter account advertising the fucking game...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 65 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

People white-knighting for Nintendo against a company that gave them an enjoyably Pokemon game.

[–] Bonesy91@lemmy.world 50 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fuck game freak. Like they cant even fix there own games and shit.

[–] MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right!? Palworld is just the game players have been begging for for a decade.

[–] Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I wouldn't go that far.

I can see why people who were into Ark, Valheim, Fortnite, Minecraft; however, it's just like any other survival builder game. It just has Pokemon in it. I don't see the hype.

[–] Raz@lemm.ee 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It just has Pokemon in it.

That's the point!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Well, Palworld developer now have $200 million more than a week ago so now they can afford lawyers as good as the Pokémon company.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

It takes weeks until they see any of that Steam money from a game they just released in early access. Though a bank might likely give them a hefty loan now for a proper defense. But let‘s not pretend Japan copyright and trademark laws are lenient or reasonable and Nintendo is basically a national treasure. If Pocketpair was based in any other country it would be different but here we really do not know how it could go.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The statement sounds like PR speak for, please stop telling us about palworld, we've heard already.

I'm sure they have been inundated by panicked investors contacting them after reading the words, "pokemon with guns" in the news. The statement should reassure them that the company takes defending their IP seriously.

The game's been out long enough for them to write a cease and desist if they wanted to get litigious.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Pretty much yeah. Mostly just "Yes, we know." If they had any real chance of killing it off, they'd have done so before the game even launched. They'll make a big show of looking into it, then grumpily admit there wasn't technically any wrongdoing and, while they don't support Palworld, they can't actually stop it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago (16 children)

At this point it would be better for nintendo to buy palworld from the delveloper and make pokemon multiversal with palworld existing in an alternate universe.

That way they could cash in on the massive success, separate it from their actual pokemon IP all whilst appeasing fans of palworld by keeping the game alive.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 51 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You seem to think they would put any value in appeasing fans of Palworld. They're not even interested in appeasing their own fans. If they could publicly behead Palworld for all it's fans to see they'd do it just to send a message.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] shotgun_crab@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

Fuck the pokemon company

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

I wish that consumers would act as hostile to the IP of this company and its parent as it acts towards other companies.

[–] Norgur@kbin.social 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We keep thinking about such IP lawsuits as "all or nothing" affairs because YouTube with their strike system and similar systems by other companies make it seem that way. Yet that's not the case.

In this instance, Game Freak and Nintendo probably cannot go after palworld as a whole but battle around and then have them change singular Pal designs. That's a super expensive thing to do and takes ages. So they'll only do that if they risk loosing the claim to some brand ownership or other.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Which would be fine, frankly. With all the money Palworld got, they can aford to redesign some creatures. The number of them that actually look like imitations in practice is much smaller than critics make it to be.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] rubikcuber@feddit.uk 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Your DMCA notice is in the mail, buddy!

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 12 points 10 months ago

eatpopcorn.gif

[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Palworld looks like shit, but it's still better than any Pokemon game on the Switch

[–] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 months ago

From what i’ve seen of the landscapes while playing, it looks beautiful. For example, was an area that reminded me of Yosemite National Park, very enchanting.

[–] Xin_shill@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wth it looks fantastic and runs good even on lower systems, unreal engine doing some work there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 12 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Do I need to play it now or never? I have a feeling this FOMO is driving some of their current engagement.

[–] electrogamerman@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

I think its a good game that you play with friends. It has a lot of minecraft (get resources and build shit) mechanics, so it is better played with others. I dont think you must play it now. Even if a lot of playes stop playing long the line, you can still enjoy the game with friends.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago (5 children)

It's like when Rust first came out but with less dong. Think I'll pass.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sparky@feddit.de 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I decided that I will check it out when it's fully released (if/whenever that happened).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›