this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
847 points (98.1% liked)

Linux

48329 readers
639 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago (3 children)

If literally any Adobe competitor released a product for Linux they'd dominate that niche.

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 25 points 10 months ago

I tend to agree. And people need to realize that Adobe's secret sauce is not in their apps, it's in the multi-device interoperability. I love lightroom, but it's not the photo editing ability (darkroom has that), rather it's the fact that I can seamlessly work the same catalogue from any device (even if I don't use their cloud for anything but smart previews).

I think Adobe would cash in if they supported Linux - for want of a workable alternative, I'd even pay them.

Music device manufacturers need to support Linux too. NI Maschine (and others) is simply a non-starter...

[–] joojmachine@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It really depends, but some tools would really do that. DaVinci Resolve, for example, has a pretty bad Linux distribution support and format, all things considered, and it's still the go-to video editor for Linux users, despite all of the issues.

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Kdenlive and shotcut are also great.

[–] joojmachine@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They really are, but still leagues behind the features (and online learning material) compared to Resolve. I love both of them, but still, when I need to get to work with video, I still prefer to deal with Resolve's limitations than to deal with Kdenlive or Shotcut.

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

Fair enough! My only work with video has been very lightweight stuff and I haven't needed much else. Shotcut definitely has quirks, though I know it a lot better than kdenlive. Have not played enough with Resolve to comment, though I have it on my list to try when the opportunity presents itself.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I say this as a foss proponent... gimp sucks ass.

Now, Inkscape is Goat, but Gimp is nigh unusable.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

When was the last time you used it? The newer versions are better and with Gimp 3 there will be many improvements.

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I guess that's fair. It works fine for me when I use it occasionally.

Stable or development branch?

[–] shredderdoitbetta@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That name though

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

There are lots of individual applications that do pretty well in and of themselves (darktable, gimp, krita, etc.) they have varying degrees of niceness. But what Adobe can do has no analogue in Linux land (paid or not) - it's the multi-device interoperability. It makes for unparalleled workflow. I am not an advocate your Adobe - I really wish there was someone else that did it, and I believe it is something worth paying for. Figma maybe? (but it's all cloud and was nearly knocked out by Adobe...)

(FWIW, I've never found gimp to be pleasant to use, but that is only my own subjective experience. Others like it and that's a good thing.)

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I appreciate GIMP but nah, it's objectively inferior to Photoshop by a long shot and development is really slow. I mean they've only just got to GTK 3.

It's comparatively difficult to use.

Plus they insist on sticking to that infantile name. I don't know how they're expecting to get industry support with a name like that.

Don't get me wrong I use it every once in a while but damn they're so far behind it's a joke. And the worst part is they seemingly don't want the project to advance.