toastus

joined 1 year ago
[–] toastus@feddit.de 6 points 3 months ago

If you ask a russian there is a good chance they will tell you Russia is "defending" one thing or another in Ukraine.
Or that russia is in fact defending itself from an attack from "the west" atm.
It's all bullshit, but propaganda will do its thing.

Nothing (russian) stopping NK from trying to "defend" some shit in SK as well.
Off course they will then find out that Putins word is not worth the dickhole it came out of, but that's another story.

[–] toastus@feddit.de 17 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Russia and entering treaties that neither party intends to honor...

[–] toastus@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So by your own claim you are part of the polytheistic church of Paul?
That just is not catholicism.
Which is so easy to prove because the catholics love to write down their many rules.

So I honestly would just answer right back at you:

FFS read a book.

And btw, while I have been an atheist for many years now, I was raised strictly catholic in a highly religious area by my catholic family that included a catholic nun and the headmaster of a catholic school and I intensively studied christianity before I made my break with this religion.

You can't bullshit me.

[–] toastus@feddit.de 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Catholicism is the church of Paul, and isn't strictly monotheistic, trinitarianism and unitarianism aside.

That is just plain wrong, no two ways about it.

To me it sounds like you listened to some protestant that doesn't care much for the catholic church and just repeat his rant without questioning it much.

And don't get me wrong, I couldn't care less about christian infighting. I was just curious about the reasoning how the catholic church, which is one of the oldest and most "original" christian churches, could be considered not christian at all.
After your post I don't believe there is much basis to this claim at all.

[–] toastus@feddit.de 4 points 6 months ago (5 children)

That is totally new to me.

Can you give me one or two of those many definitions for my understanding?

[–] toastus@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago

I had success talking about the tortoise one with imaginary time stamps.

I think it gets more understandable that this pseudo paradox just uses smaller and smaller steps for no real reason.
If you just go one second at a time you can clearly see exactly when the tortoise gets overtaken.

[–] toastus@feddit.de 13 points 6 months ago

Do you actually wonder?

Those caps get lost way less and since the bottles themselves usually get recycled now the caps also stay in the cycle.

And it took me like 5 bottles to get used to it.
Even a slow learner should get it sooner or later.

[–] toastus@feddit.de 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I guess, but that shouldn't be an issue for any existing user.

So for anyone already using it, it's a strict improvement.

[–] toastus@feddit.de 5 points 8 months ago
[–] toastus@feddit.de 9 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I don't necessarily disagree, but why isn't it widely adopted then?

[–] toastus@feddit.de 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If meta joined, the users that make most fediverse content now will see their engagement drop.

That's where you lose me again.
Why would the engagement drop if a ton more users could consume your content.

It's not like the ratio of content creators to lurkers is any better on meta apps than here.

Btw thank you for the good faith discussion, I don't think that would have happened at the old place.

view more: next ›