peregrin5

joined 1 month ago
[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago

That was my second mistake. My first was not blocking hexbear in the first place.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago

I'm learning that most of Lemmy has pretty thin skin. Lol.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee -1 points 7 hours ago

Oh but it does. :)

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 0 points 7 hours ago

Never said they didn't. Unlike some, I don't get bent out of shape when I get banned.

I may post and laugh about it though. And fuck no to moderating. Lmao. I have a life.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Ah also it seems you and others are confused. The 1:53 action was not my comment though I did approve of it.

I updated the post to give the full context.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 11 points 8 hours ago

Think of all the disaffected princes they'd be inheriting.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 0 points 8 hours ago

The screenshot doesn't have my comment in it hun.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Yeah I can see how that could be misleading. That was a comment from someone else that got removed (and what I was referring to when I said the rest of the modlog was pretty entertaining). I guess I should have cropped it but I thought it was funny too. As you can see that mod action happened two hours before my ban.

At the time I screenshotted they hadn't removed my comment. I think they did now though.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee -2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

The numbers quoted within the article do not matter as the fact that someone claiming genocide is more interesting news than people who do not. You can't really use any news article quoting a handful of people you don't know how they sampled to make a calculation on consensus.

Now you are looking for only works published within the last 15 days only (since that is how many days we've had in 2025 so far) and you claim you are not moving goal posts. Lol.

And you change your request for a third (fourth?) time claiming it was about the UN and Amnesty international. Lol. That was literally not part of your original request and this constant goal post moving is why I refused to engage with you in this futile exercise of you lifting the football every time I try to kick it.

Remember your original claim is that “EVERY expert agrees that a genocide is occurring", something I've already proven wrong several times at this point. Take the L and let me move on with my life. Goddamn.

Hell I don't even think Israel is justified in the amount of damage they are causing, they are obviously committing war crimes, and Bibi should burn in hell. I just don't think it's a genocide.

If that means you have to stalk every thread I go to to alert people that I don't agree with you that a genocide is happening then you my friend have too much time on your hands.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

Genuinely curious here. What comment? As far as I saw the modlog didn't show the comment I got banned for.

Full context: someone had posted a picture of the Obamas in a wine cellar and deriding them for being so bourgeois as to own a wine cellar.

I pointed out that this was them at a private event at a restaurant that has a wine cellar and not their own personal wine cellar. Everyone then freaked out that I was "defending the Obamas" and I got banned for Liberalism. Lol.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

But hey you can make fun of them here. So it all works out in the end. Let them have their circlejerk where they can exist without having their views challenged. In reality (real reality, not the rest-of-lemmy reality which is just as skewed) literally nobody likes them and most people in their lives probably think they are insufferable.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 0 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

You don't get to claim moral superiority and do whatever you want regardless.

But see the thing is, I do in fact get to do that. They can ban me but I can still claim moral superiority. What do you think this whole community is about?

12
submitted 21 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) by peregrin5@lemm.ee to c/meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works
 

I pointed out the dishonest outright lies a post was making and rustled some jimmies.

Any day I rustle the jimmies of tankies is a good day.

The rest of the modlog was pretty entertaining too.

Edit: No the comment below my ban in this screenshot is not my comment. I guess that was confusing some people.

Full context: someone had posted a picture of the Obamas in a wine cellar and everyone was deriding them for being so bourgeois as to own a wine cellar (all the usual high level discourse such as "MichelleSoUgly lmaolol")

I pointed out that this was them at a private event at a restaurant that has a wine cellar and not their own personal wine cellar. Everyone then freaked out that I was "defending the Obamas" and I got banned for Liberalism.

view more: next ›