lord_ryvan

How so?

In my opinion GitHub is seriously good software, but it is awkward when FOSS software is developed on it instead of on Codeberg, Gitea or another FOSS platform.

Discord is actually a security risk, it walls information off the outside world (compared to a forum or IRC server) and incredibly difficult to find information in even when you're in the server (as opposed to documentation or a forum)

Matrix has 2/3 of these issues, so it being FOSS aside I very much would hate it when development discussion and software documentation is done through Matrix, as well.

JetBrains' AI code suggestions were only trained on code where authors gave explicit permission for it, but that's the only one I know from the top of my head. Most chat-oriented LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini...) were almost certainly trained using corporate piracy.

That's not what sandboxed means and Nix isn't sandboxed.

Sandboxed means it runs in a separate container, often with limited permissions; raising security at the cost of performance.

Oh so that wasn't a joke from their booth.

This seems really out of place, but locally ran auto subtitles from ethically sourced AI would be great.

It's just that there's two very big conditions in that sentence there.

I wonder how powerful a device you need to run this live a la YouTube auto caption-style.

Does anyone have experience with this?

They're helpful to my deaf ears, even when they're wrong (50% of the words) they do give me a solid idea of what is being said together with what the audio sounds like.

With it, I get almost everything correct. Without it, I understand near to nothing.

This only goes for English spoken by Americans and sometimes London Britons, sadly, nothing else get detected nearly as good enough, so I can't enjoy YouTube in my native language (Dutch), but being able to consume English YouTube already helps a lot!

Doesn't mean it'll be added in an open source application... There has to be a dev/some devs willing to implement that, they can't force volunteers to implement features because of the selling value it'll have.

I'll see if I can raise an issue with the devs of Boost because that didn't fix it.

A \ might, but it seems simple enough to me to exclude readme.md from being automatically marked as a link. And that phrase basically never refers to a link (:

Including screen share with audio?

That forwards to a shadily different URL.

Why does Boost turn that into a clickable link in the first place..?

It's also the discussion platform for open source (sadly)