griefstricken

joined 2 months ago
[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

You're encouraging someone who wants to block "problematic instances" in this case people voicing opposition to that xenophobia, to host lemmy (an open source project where most instances have large linux communities), and taking them seriously on their concern trolling in the first place. It does send a bit of an unusual message.

Anyways I stand by it, that person should fuck off back to reddit.

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's literally just speculation. Even if it were true, what the fuck does that have to do with the nationality of a few Linux contributors? Have you people cracked?

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I wonder if there are any official US documents declaring an intent to hide cyberattacks under the flags of foreign nations? 🤭 Wouldn't that be droll?

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lmao sarcasm is indistinguishable from the full on brigading from the "help tankies are brigading us" instances going on in here to me 😅

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

That just smells like an actual false flag operation to me.

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's not uncommon for hackers to sell cures for problems they cause. This includes law enforcement, which can have broader goals like promoting their own cybersecurity outfits, even just promoting deoendency on HIBP if it's a fed thing would be useful here, making the joke they left on the page telling people to check out the site itself suspect. The internet archive is a large and beloved outlet for piracy and depaywalling, maybe the security enhancements being billed to them could help the industry bring them to heel a bit. Just speculating.

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I have to say that the way they are advertising "HAVE I BEEN PWNED" makes this look like law enforcement selling cures to problems they create. The owner has that CIA front company type CV. It makes my head shudder uncontrollably. 🐙🌕🤕

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Did you find an answer to this?

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

To be honest, the only reason why any of that appeared to be true, or the west appeared to uphold free speech, just like free trade policies and laissez faire approach to international finance, that was all just because Wall St did not feel threatened, that was all just because the propaganda was received unthinkingly for the past 30 years or so. Especially between 2001 and the first part of the financial crash.

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

Fact is you know I am right, you just don't have any principles. You seem baffled some people uphold principles.

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The funny thing is Stuxnet is a good example of how sanctions can backfire. We used a supply chain attack and the Iranians hardened their systems. Can anyone really claim it was any different than another Mossad "humiliate them and hope something happens" operation that ultimately blew the cover off years of intelligence work?

The Lebanon pagers attack, Russian sanctions and CERN or Linux creating reverse brain drain will continue to backfire, on our ability to even twist these screws, also on our supply chains in countries which consider themselves a US target or even just a middleman.

view more: ‹ prev next ›