asjmcguire

joined 1 year ago
[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Been the victim of fraud. Unfortunately - yes.
When I was younger and Chip 'n' PIN was becoming popular, many smaller shops had a Paypoint machine that would print the entire card number and CCV on the receipt. I was so paranoid about fraud, especially given that there was sufficient information printed on the receipt that anyone could do an Amazon order with those details. I used to get a black permanent marker and scribble the details out before putting the receipt in the bin.

Imagine my horror when a decade later, I learn that I have been the victim of fraud, and a type of fraud it was entirely impossible for me to prevent. In the UK fraudsters watch for new companies popping up on Companies House and then use the details to go on a shopping spree. The way it works is like this:

They see my name, address and date of birth on the website. They are looking for a name that matches their surname and first initial. So for me that could be Alexander Jones for example. They go to a retail park and pop into Argos. They order several thousand pounds of stuff. When they go to pay, the person at the counter helpfully asks "Do you have an Argos credit card? If you apply for one today, we'll transfer the balance of today's purchases to the card" and armed with my address, date of birth and name, and a card that already has the same surname and first initial as me - they are accepted for an Argos credit card. Post nothing for the goods they just bought and leave the store. They go next door to JJB sports, and then whole process repeats. "Do you have a JJB sports card? If you get one today...."

They visited 6 stores in an hour and repeated this process at all of them. And a week later I start receiving credit cards.....

It's a surprisingly common scam (or it was), brought on entirely by the shops bring pushed to get people to sign up for credit cards.....

I had to be on a register for several years, so if anyone tried to open an account or take out credit in my name, I would get a phone call to check if it was actually me.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Canada has decent healthcare, and I'd be worried that if we let you have Canada - you'd degrade that. America is basically a floating shopping mall. Everything is for sale. Even things that really shouldn't be.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Making jokes is how people cope with tragic events.
This is why there is the on-going debate, that no topic should ever be unavailable to joke about.

I remember that the very same day that Princess Diana died, people were saying "Died in a nasty accident" and that was before the days of the internet being popular, that was a joke that spread around the country by text message.

 

joehumphrey (@joehumphrey@writeout.ink)

I'm posting this here because I don't have the character limit needed to post it on my main account, so bear with me.


Something I just thought of. For a number of years, I received treatment for low testosterone. When I was born, I had a hernia surgery that damaged my right testicle and stunted its growth. When I was twelve, they removed it because they worried that it showed signs of becoming potentially cancerous. It wasn’t a big deal. I got a prosthetic and now I have one flesh testicle and one robot testicle. I’m a cyborg. Flash forward to my mid-thirties when I asked my doctor if my noticeably soft and high voice could be due to a lack of testosterone from my single testicle. He said it wasn’t likely but possible and ran some blood tests and discovered that my testosterone was almost totally bottomed out, possibly due to my testicular situation, and also from my obesity. So they started me on testosterone treatments. First, it was androgen gel that I rubbed on my chest and was warned to keep far from my wife, who would be affected detrimentally if she touched it. That I wasn’t comfortable with for long, so we switched to testosterone injections. I did that for years, and it made a difference. I felt my energy change, my mental health improved and, oddly, I felt more “masculine” whatever that means in my life. I’ve never been particularly masculine in the traditional sense, despite my size and general appearance. What I’m getting at, is that low testosterone was affecting my mental health, and taking supplemental testosterone improved that mental health, as well as my self-image because I felt more confident in my gender. I felt more masculine, which was great because I’m a man. No one ever once questioned my use of T for my mental health and self-image. It was just never a thing. The doctor figured out that this would help me, so they gave it to me because that’s a doctor’s job. To treat the health of their patients. I’m a cis man so I pretty much get what I want without much fuss. That’s a privilege I have and other people don’t. Because society is fucked in the head. So my question is why the hell is it anyone’s business? If someone started questioning my use of Testosterone to treat my mental and physical health, I’d tell them to fuck off and mind their own business. It’s got nothing to do with anyone beyond my family and my doctor. Again, that's my privilege. It boggles my mind that people receiving gender-affirming care are being denied that treatment because of how they identify. Hormonal treatment to help with mental and physical health, just like me. Treatment that helps align my body with my idea of what my body should feel and perform like. And most importantly, it’s NO ONE’S FUCKING BUSINESS. It’s absurd and offensive that trans people can’t follow their doctor’s recommendation and treat their health/identity concerns without being scrutinized, bullied, and even denied that care. Children who desperately need this care are being denied it and it’s leading to their death in many cases. The way we treat trans people is horrifying. It’s truly offensive. Things need to change and quickly. We’re losing babies because we’re allowing politicians and zealots and bullies to dictate the health decisions of children instead of doctors. That’s one of the most demented things I’ve seen happen in our culture in my lifetime. These are people trying to live their lives and treat their health in the best way they know how. More importantly, in the best way their DOCTORS know how. It’s no one’s fucking business. Tangentially, I could make a very similar post about abortion. I have an idea! Let's not get involved in other people's medical decisions! Can we do that please?

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I think it would be awesome, but - my understanding is that AMA events tend to require quite a bit of moderation. Do we have good enough moderation on either platform yet - to be able to cope with an event like this?

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I mean... Are you still there?
If so - one of those huge lasagnas would be awesome. Cheers.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Next step - should be a server that simply coordinates video transcoding, and users can run an application on their computer which will do the transcoding when it's idle and deliver the transcoded video back to the server. Like the rest of the Fediverse, make the community actually part of the community. I'm sure many of us would be happy to donate spare CPU time.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

This is awesome game changing stuff for PeerTube. Especially since it lays the groundwork for more distributed tasks down the road.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Excellent! If you looking for an Android app - although the PWA is pretty good too, Readrops is what I use, because it supports the GoogleReader API that FreshRSS exposes.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But the vast majority of them don't know about the fediverse, and will stick with the status quo. They are only going to find out about the fediverse by becoming part of it, without necessarily knowing that they are becoming part of it. The vast majority of meta users, either on facebook or instagram, or even whatsapp - just want to be able to talk to their friends.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I feel like outside the federated system, meta would rely on geographic metadata (eg IP address) to identify if a user was within the scope of the GDPR or not. But they aren't going to have access to any of this information, when they receive the data from another server in the fediverse. There will be zero way for them to identify if a user from any server in the fediverse would be applicable to the GDPR or not, because any user from any country can basically sign up anywhere. It will be difficult for them to argue against that - since it's highly publicised that when Mastodon was struggling under the strain of the massive influx of new users - that people were being advised to find an instance that aligned to their interests rather than just their geographical location. Indeed I am on a Scottish server - where I arrived in 2019, but I have recently started another account on a US server ( allthingstech.social) so I would indeed be a user protected by GDPR on a US server. Because Meta have no way of knowing where a user comes from, the only thing they can definitely legally do - is process data from their own known users - but they are crossing into dangerous territory the second they start trying to process data from users outside their own instance. In my opinion anyway.

And no I don't mind debating at all. There needs to be a lot more debate, and a lot less death threats and screaming matches online - in order for us to start resolving anything.

Edit:
The GDPR applies to data on people. So in your example - it doesn't matter how Meta got the data, the point is that they have data on citizens that are protected by the GDPR, the fact that the data arrived indirectly via a US server, doesn't remove the protection afforded to the EU citizen

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Meta can have the data, that part yes you consent to by using ActivityPub software, though there is a whole other argument to get into later about whether "normal" users really understand that. But no Meta absolutely cannot process that data, for creating shadow profiles or anything like that - unless the user explicitly opts in. GDPR is quite clear that you cannot infer that a user agree based on some other influence (in this case the user using ActivityPub) - the user MUST have been presented with a dialog explaining what Meta would do with the data and giving the user the option to say they agree or disagree with it.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You bring up an interesting point, because of how the fediverse works, every server (that has an active subscription) essentially has a mirror of the original data. So if Facebook have data from people who never consented to that, then they would surely be breaking GDPR rules? GDPR rules say that they can only PROCESS the data (or mine it - if you want to use a more realistic term) if a user has explicitly agreed to that, implicit agreement doesn't count. So this is going to interesting to see how they manage this - providing that they don't process the data and simply present it, as is - they don't break GDPR, but the second that they start processing it, they breach GDPR. Now - they can process data that belongs to their users, but they would have to write code that ensures they don't ingest posts from any user that is not a meta user - for the purposes of harvesting it.

view more: next ›