TheSpookiestUser

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago

Because Reddit is in the unique position where a small amount of users can affect a vast swathe of their platform - moderators.

Most mods don't care, by volume. The ones that do are often also the ones that are more active, more engaged, and more entwined with communities outside Reddit.

During the protest last year, polls come back favorably pretty much everywhere to shut down - but after the shutdown actually happened, a tidal wave of lurkers who never vote and never comment came out of the woodwork to complain and call it all stupid. Public opinion of all users is likely against practically any protest that could happen.

I don't like it, but that's how it is. The best realistic outcome is that a large contingent of content creators and more informed users leave the site - but how many of those are left that haven't already vamoosed and are still willing to leave under some unknown worse circumstance?

[–] TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Not in any way the average user cares much about.

The causal social media user cares for two things:

  1. A constant uninterrupted stream of content

  2. Dopamine in the form of upvotes/likes/what have you

If these two things aren't interupted, 90% of users won't care.

[–] TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Let's be honest with ourselves - no, it won't be wildly unpopular. This change affects very few people and the people still using Reddit at this point likely won't care much, and I have doubt any future change would cause much outrage either.

Because think about this - who is actively complaining and gnashing their teeth about the continued downward spiral and still scrolling, posting, moderating there at this point? I'd love to believe more people would jump ship - but if it ever happened it would take a far larger-scope fuckup than anything we've seen so far.

There is a point where more users may bring more downsides than upsides - but we haven't reached that point yet. There are still many many niche communities that have no equivalent here and starting them would never take off with the current number of people.

[–] TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

People that don't check what community a post came from on their home feed and just upvote it if they like it.

Full disclosure: that was me just now until I opened the comments, realized, then took it back. It's very easy to miss sometimes

[–] TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Good luck lads.

🫡

[–] TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world 80 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Scaled sorting is gonna be huge I think. Really looking forward to that

[–] TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

the smell of heavily chlorinated water. i used to spend a heck of a lot of time at the pool when i was a kid, and where i live now there aren't nearly as many pools, so it's not something encountered often anymore.

Oh I can imagine. Expect some pushback no matter which way that vote goes, people get real vocal about political content, especially US and double especially Trump related.

[–] TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The absolute easiest way without having to use an external site would probably be to post 1 comment per option you want voted on, lock the post, and ask people to upvote the option they want. This also lets people vote for multiple options at once, for better or worse.

If you want to use an external site consider Strawpoll. Very quick and easy to set up.

[–] TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reminds me of a lion's pelt, all it needs is a mane

 
 
 
view more: next ›