Hereforpron2

This must be how you get "binders full of women"

I feel ya, the number of times I've opened up my gear to get just a few more months out of it til the next thing breaks...

If you want to maximize versatility and quality for a good price, I'd consider getting a nice enough espresso-focused grinder and a really high quality hand grinder that can do coarse grinds well. Grinding coarse is fast and easy by hand, and you can get grounds as or more consistent than am electric grinder 3 times the price with something like a 1zpresso. But grinding for espresso can be harder, so that's one that's more worth a machine doing the work for you.

Very true, especially because taste (and the calibration of the grinder you receive) don't always line up with the grind size distributions you see other people make from experimenting. For me it's always had to be one at a time, compared to what I was using before and returning if the intended upgrade isn't satisfactory.

It would be amazing if coffee shops started doing equipment tastings/comparisons as well as beans. We have a lot of cool cuppings/tasting courses here, but nothing for hardware.

I do/have used a Kruve an I've been very surprised with by my findings with it. In my experience, even very nice grinders I've tried still produce like 4% fines, and some midrange ones are maybe only 6%. By percent, that's significant enough, but in the end it's less than a gram difference, and therefore sorta hard to use as the comparison between 2 grinders. Sifting is also essentially worthless for that purpose if you didn't take the same measurement when the grinder was new, since you have nothing to compare the present to.

I honestly think your best bet is going by taste. If you feel the quality of your cup has declined, that's probably the best way to be sure. Everything else is just a proxy for trying to determine how the cup will taste.

Lol they said "threatening violence" because it was the easiest thing to ban you with. The real reason you got banned is that you're a psycho, man. You sound like you are saying you wish you were allowed to hurt or kill your own children, and you're talking about them as property. That's crazy person shit.

Like almost any concept, the argument over free will really becomes semantic (and pedantic) when pushed to academic extremes. At a certain point it shifts to "is there a difference between free will and the apparent ability to choose what we do in any given moment?"

This scientist claims that the inability to tease any choice from the infinite variables that affect that decision means that the decision isn't ours. It is an equally valid conclusion that you don't need to know every single thing that influences you in order to have agency among those influences.

Moore's take on the Cartesian question of "how do we know we exist?" is similar. It points out that the debate actually has nothing to do with existence, but what it means to "know" something, and that "knowing," like anything, can of course be made impossible with philosophical and academic contortions (e.g., arguments like "but what if this is a simulation and there is a "great deception" that only convinces you that you exist?"). It is not that some form of knowing cannot exist, it is that people are capable of imagining fantasies in which knowing cannot exist, and Moore denies that we should let the ability to conceptualize something beyond the intended context of our language (i.e., perceived reality) pervert our ability to see and accept something concrete.

Is Moore right? Who knows, but he gets at the point that the answers to questions of free will, existence, ontology, etc. have more to do with how the questions are framed academically and philosophically than with how the same concepts actually operate in real life. It will always be possibly to frame a question (or to define the words within a question) in a way that denies the possibility of knowing or agency. But the ability to do so doesn't mean that other methods of asking or knowing are impossible.

This joke is just swell

Try posting on Nextdoor!

That's great to know. I'm definitely excited to pick up a bag

I'll have to try it!

Colectivo from Milwaukee. Best prices for really well sourced coffee. They are really a 3rd wave roaster with a starbucks-like cafe setup that allows them to sell much cheaper than others even though they are still sourcing really great single origins and small session roasting. I've tried em all and Colectivo takes the price:quality ratio hands down.

Their Brazil is super chocolatey and not bitter at all for folks who don't necessarily love coffee, but people who really do will still find interesting notes and appreciate how well it's roasted. a bit of acidity but no bitterness, full body but subtle notes, total crowd pleaser.

Good riddance