Guilvareux

joined 1 year ago
[–] Guilvareux@feddit.uk 13 points 7 months ago (5 children)
[–] Guilvareux@feddit.uk 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Asking for info: What’s you specific concern regarding this information? Is it that data is accessible in the USA, you don’t trust the company?

[–] Guilvareux@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They’re “complaining” about unique qualities of their art being used, without consent, to create new things which ultimately de-value their original art.

It’s a debate to be had, I’m not clearly in favour of either argument here, but it’s quite obvious what they’re upset with.

[–] Guilvareux@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Don’t oversimplify though, remember you need to put lightning into it first!

[–] Guilvareux@feddit.uk 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It was hardly a scandal. They complied with their local laws, as would be expected. They’re very well-known to be a swiss company. Complying with swiss law shouldn’t be a surprise.

A more fair criticism would be that, after this event they changed the precise wording in their marketing (and maybe tos?) to more accurately reflect what they could offer.

[–] Guilvareux@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

The Two Generals Problem

Not sure whether this was definitely the issue, but interesting nonetheless.