FiskFisk33

xitter

this is what I feel too. It's framed as helpful, but it is really unnecessary and often unwanted.

I love the comment that it's "occasionally useful"

ok, I define 1 as {∅} and 2 as {∅, {∅}}

proving the addition holds is slightly more complicated

I would've preferred Colin McRae's classic in the same spirit: "when in doubt, flat out"

your fridge bread stales quicker than it would in room temperature, that's just a fact.

"what do you mean environmental impact, if people paid for the gasoline then what's the problem?"

it wasn't just reddit, it felt like half the world saw him as that iron man dude

...yes?

Sin? I just want there to be competitors.

"No right" to express confusion? Lol.

As it stands, they don't get paid when you pay for reading it anyways. They themselves pay to publish it to a journal, the journal then sells it to you.

The scientists aren't paid by people reading their science, they are paid by grants, for doing the science in the first place.

I wholeheartedly support academic "piracy", it only hurts the gatekeepers.