El_Dorado

joined 1 year ago
[–] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Comment for visibility of this

[–] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

I'd love to know that as well. So if you guys have any news let's have it

[–] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What if the cop is a cute girl?

[–] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago

That's the lovely bit about putting a bill out there. The enforcement and feasibility is not the problem of the politicians anymore.

[–] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

Well all you can say is bye bye and good luck

[–] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Haha yes definitely something to follow. I'm looking forward to lists of companies that left UK because of this (as announced) and lists of companies that stay and thus prove that their end-to-end encryption isn't a real one

[–] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 56 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Haha yes also incredibly that they had to point out this sentence "Tech companies have said scanning messages and end-to-end encryption are fundamentally incompatible."

Very astonishing how there are some fundamental lacks of understanding from politicians advertising this. Or all on purpose

[–] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Wouldn't he just be able to sue them then?

 

I was reading about the allegations against Russell Brand and couldn't help but wonder how it works legally that his revenue can be blocked based on allegations and before any juridical ruling.

Don't get me wrong I don't know much about the guy and what he did or didn't do and agree that anyone should be punished according to their crimes.

But how is this possible with the principal of innocent until proven guilty? I'd be happy if someone could explain me.

[–] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

Do you refer to another source than the article? Because in their linked article it does not refer to several occasions.

[–] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are you talking about American schools?

If you are : dresscodes in schools are not as wide spread in Europe as they are in the US.

But in any case the article cites the reasoning behind sending the student home. And it was because of supposedly religious affiliate clothing.

[–] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Is there a special discussion thread somewhere on Lemmy?

 

Quote from the article:

"It was the result of having multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same story about quoting the Sermon on the Mount, parenthetically, in their preaching — "turn the other cheek" — [and] to have someone come up after to say, "Where did you get those liberal talking points?" And what was alarming to me is that in most of these scenarios, when the pastor would say, "I'm literally quoting Jesus Christ," the response would not be, "I apologize." The response would be, "Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. That's weak." And when we get to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are seen as subversive to us, then we're in a crisis."

view more: next ›