I mean, isn't that a legitimate concern considering how many privacy focused services are built on top of / around TOR?
DahGangalang
I have a feeling OP is low key that Dad guy from youtube cause hes just way too wholesome for the real internet.
Oh no, now we have to ban them all?? What a shame!
/s
So what I'm hearing is that we just need to selectively breed people to have smaller penises so we can just use chicken intestines for condoms instead?
I don't think so. But I think that that's going to vary a lot based on how you want to measure "badness for the climate".
My instinct is to look at Feed to Gain Ratio, which is the measure of food eaten to weight gained. This will vary animal to animal based on the animal's purpose (meat cows vs dairy cows, meat lambs vs wool sheep, etc) and the type of food they're fed.
Still, there are reliable bands for estimating for each animal. According to This Article, it looks like sheep can fall into a 4:1 to 6:1 ratio while cows are closer to 12:1 (this is a bit higher than I was taught in high school biology, but not by much). Of course, the higher these numbers, the "worse" the animal is for the environment.
This, but un-sarcastically.
Would be an interesting boost to the Sheep industry.
Sorry, was definitely reading this 90% asleep as I rolled out of bed. Thanks for the extra link anyway.
Can you pass a link?
FARTEE FRATER
Yup, found the round earther.
They asked if I had a degree in theoretical physics.
I said I have a theoretical degree in physics.
They said welcome aboard.
Zac Efron.
The girl I was crushing on in high school crushed on him really hard as he appeared in High School Musical. I spent wayyyy too much of my youth trying to emulate Zac Efron as a result. Eventually, that whole style just kinda became my whole style. Seems like a good fit.