CrypticCoffee

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In agile development. You do a little, release. Otherwise it is too big and may never be done. The fact they committed resources to improve this is a positive. The hope is they build on it and add more options.

However, if they get trashed for trying, they and many other companies may not try. Why spend money to get a bad reputation when the spending nothing creates less I'll will to the company. That is ultimately the decision Product Owners and Designers will weigh up.

I think for progress, the best approach is maybe "positive first step but more options are needed for non-bonary for this to really make players feel comfortable".

From a technical perspective, separating pronoun hard coding from the models gives more scope to give more options in the future, however, as someone mentioned, there is a lot of art work needed on assets and animations so the new shapes function the same in all cases.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know enough, little one. Maybe you do.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You're insufferable. Surprised you still ain't on reddit. That's where the corporate bootlickers are. I guess Lemmy.world is the next best place.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Or "Duck it up"

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

No. It's when bugs and crashes happen, and trying to identify how. Such as stack traces for example, or memory usage when an app keels over.

I'm not here to market FF, I'm here trying to counter balance the Firefox haters that spend so much hate to trash the only real legitimate chance we have of Google not dictating web standards. I don't know why so many people shill for billion dollar companies. Do they love Google that much, or are they simply useful idiots?

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (7 children)

It's open source. You're assuming this is telemetry without having an idea. Could be diagnostics, could be pocket, could be sync check.

Without evidence, sounds like a load of FUD.

It's ironic you call me dense.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Of course not. It's an internet browser. What point are you trying to make?

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (11 children)

What are you stating cannot be turned off?

This sounds baseless without any evidence.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (13 children)

And it can be turned off.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is the bargaining stage of the five stages of grief.

Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Firefox works for nearly everything. The only stuff that doesn't work for me is Xitter embeds, and this is a gift that keeps on giving.

 

Looks like UK is going the same way as a few states. Spare a thought for us. So messed up this increasing surveillance state.

 

cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/5707453

The Chrome team says they're not going to pursue Web Integrity but...

it is piloting a new Android WebView Media Integrity API that’s “narrowly scoped, and only targets WebViews embedded in apps.”

They say its because the team "heard your feedback." I'm sure that's true, and I can wildly speculate that all the current anti-trust attention was a factor too.

Many said we couldn’t stop it. We, like many, applied pressure, and they backed the fuck off.

We have no room for complacency now though. Google cannot be allowed to dictate web standards. Firefox needs to eat into that Chromium market share.

Never forgive. Never forget.

view more: next ›