See...if " the AI company" has access to the data, instead of the hospital using a local implementation of said AI, they've already failed according to Hipaa
Bronzebeard
joined 1 month ago
That's what I typed, my phone had other ideas.
False... Any system that access medical data needs to follow the same HIPAA laws regarding information access. Putting that info into a database doesn't absorb you of the responsibility of protecting that data, neither would giving access to that database to an AI
You missed a couple history lessons, there, bro.
This is funny because you're the one confusing LLM as the only option when it comes to AI.
A lot of things actually. A ton of material science breakthroughs lately. Science in general. I've read about recent astronomical discoveries, too.
They wouldn't have lost either.
Pelosi tanking kneecapping any attempt to curb congressional insider trading certainly didn't help. Nor did funding a fucking genocide. Their continued subservience to donors over their voters drives people away.
Oh wow, you're incredibly gullible. Speaking of strawman...
~~They did until the Great Maple Syrup Reserve Heist occurred...~~
Someone beat me to it
Oh cool, it had been a couple years since housing prices went vertical...
They've always used some kind of ambiguity in wording to hide behind. There is none in regards to this. It is directly spelled out.
And you already acting like they can ignore it without a care IS WHAT ALLOWS THEM TO GET AWAY WITH IT.
Stop enabling fascists, please.