Blahaj zone will ban you at the drop of a hat based on political belief.
BrainInABox
joined 1 month ago
I don't, no. But people like the person I'm replying to have spend the last fifteen months insisting it's fine.
"Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past."
- Jean-Paul Sartre
Lol, everyone can see that both I and others have refuted your arguments. You pretending you can’t see that only makes you look like a sore loser.
They both can and frequently do influence the information you are exposed to on social media to influence your decision making.
You know what they say about assertions made without evidence.
So you were lying when you said you couldn't see them, because you've replied to ones that actively refute you statements.
Yes, and all evil is secretly him. Just like you say, secretly he's working with everyone bad in the USA, and he's secretly a very important figure in US politics. Just like he's secretly behind me stubbing my toe.
Well he accused me of being a Trump supporter because he didn't see me criticize Trump, so I pointed out that I didn't see him criticize Hitler...
I'd say that your client must be broken, but you're managing to reply to me, despite claiming you can't see my posts.
Lol, everyone can see that both I and others have refuted your arguments. You pretending you can't see that only makes you look like a sore loser.
Yea, Supporting Hamas does, if you actually try convincing other people to do the same, since Switzerland officially sees Hamas as Terror organisation. Fedpol has only acted based on that, but not decided it.
The idea that the government can unilaterally and arbitrarily declare that it's illegal to support a resistance group is the most anti-free speech thing I can possibly imagine. This is seriously the most extremist view possible. You would have supported criminalizing support for Nelson Mandela.
Just supporting Palestine does not make you extremist
Apparently it would if the government told you it did.
Yea, anyone who supports military to invade other countries is in my eyes an extremist.
Not in the eyes of Fedpol though, quite the opposite: they claim supporting people opposing invasion is extremism. You also would have supported criminalizing support for the allies invading the Nazis. Again, that's not a question, that's what you believe.
For being opposed to western chauvinism.