BothsidesistFraud

Thanks for the explanation and link

Your home instance is lemmy.world, which is outright defederated with all but lemmy.ml

Still learning. How are you here from lemmy.today if lemmy.world is defederated (maybe I don't know what defederated means)

Good, was sick last week and now feeling a lot better so it's like the world is open with possibilities again.

Regarding the sickness, I was at like 70% for a full week. Not enough to actually lay around and be lazy all day but sick enough that I couldn't really stomach doing anything of importance.

The "source" request is also annoying because it's like, dude we're just chatting here, no I'm not going to respond like this is some academic debate.

I had one of his books of short stories when I was a teen (The Cyberiad) and loved it...meaning to read more of his work

That's true only if homeless people make zero noise, do not act or behave eccentrically, do not bother other customers, do not have offensive odors, immediately cede their seat to a customer who arrives, somehow don't make through their presence prospective customers believe the shop is too crowded, etc. Do you think even actual customers who are not mentally disturbed or addicted can fulfill this bar you've set by saying "costs nothing"?

Warming is a canard, every street homeless person can get warm at a church or shelter. In NYC you can 311 a city department and they'll go offer the person a ride to a shelter anywhere in the city in a van. Their average time is <1 hour. They can walk into any library in the city.

I encounter homeless every day and resent dumb online joke, these are individuals who have serious problems and, as stated, there is a reason even public services find it hard to serve these populations.

There's also a reason neither you nor I regularly invite street homeless into our homes.

If you don't like megacorp there are 1000 better ways you can argue it than saying "they should let homeless in to hang out". Choosing the argument that you have chosen, just sounds ridiculous.

I know you're just circlejerking here so discussion is probably pointless, but there are many ways to serve the community and providing a quiet, nicely ambient place (aspirational goals, only met sometimes in reality) to sit or work for a few hours, for the price of a $3 coffee is one. I live in New York and for just over the price of a subway ride I can get wifi, a desk to work, outlets and a decently comfortable chair, and a restroom, and I can hang out there a while.

Serving the homeless in public places is notoriously difficult to get right, as most state and local governments experience demonstrates. Why we'd expect a cafe company to do a good job as well as meet its other goals is confusing.

Read this many years ago and enjoyed. Great recommendation in the spirit of this thread (for anyone who has not read it)

Most people near a Starbucks are near a better coffee shop or cafe that's independently owned.

Why would it possibly be on Starbucks to provide places for homeless people to hang out for hours. This should be a public function.

Two things can be true:

Trump is bad and useless.

DEI programs are bad and useless.