Aceticon

joined 2 months ago
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

Re-read my post.

I'm actually in a political party that actually fights against that shit, busy campaigning in elections, participating in party conferences and even manning election booths, not busy whitewashing the Genocide support of my favored pro-Genocide political party whilst sending letters to a leadership that couldn't give a rat's arse about what I think because I'm supporting them where it counts no matter how evil they act, so they have no reason to change tack away from Evil-doing.

By providing comfort and support to politicians that militarilly support an ongoing Genocide, you're indirectly supporting Genocide, at the very least because those politicians won't change if they're supported not mater what, so you're making sure they remain supporting Genocide whenever they have a chance.

Absolutelly, compliment the leadership of your party on the things they do right (not merelly what they say) AND chastise them on the things they do wrong like supporting the mass murder of children because they're from a "human animal" ethnicity.

I'm starting to think the difference between us is that I'm driven by Principle - I don't live in America, I don't live in Palestine, I'm safelly in Europe on the opposite side of the continent from Russia, I could just ignore the butchering in Palestine or the butchering in Ukraine because, hey, "I'm Alright Jack", but I won't because that shit is wrong, and I don't mean just a bit wrong, I mean "getting way too close to Nazi-level wrong" - whilst you are driven by the fear of what can happen to your daughter in Trump's America, which is understandable but is not Principle, it's all about you and yours - a selfish reason, not just taking an stand on principle without gaining anything from it.

Maybe that's why I can't stand Mass Murderers, Genociders, Xenophobes and those who enable them, whilst you run around excusing them and thus doing your bit to enable them to carry on doing what they do - as long as they give you what you want for you and yours, You're Alright and fuck the rest!

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Mainly spreading awareness of what's going and exposing the flawed logic and lies in pro-Israeli propaganda since the very start and pointing out the hypocrisy of those who empower the Genociders by supporting politicians who knowingly and actively give them military support. (To the point that I've actually received e-mails in my native language from a Tel Aviv based organisation inviting me to a "learn about Israel" web course, which is funny 'cause I've never published my e-mail address here)

I'm also a member of a small party in the country I live in which is very loudly against the Israeli Occupation and the Israeli Genocide.

I keep on hammering against the whitewashing of the Democrat Genociders because their actions help normalized the support of Genocide and extreme racism in the US - they're supposed to be an alternative to the likes of Trump, the opposite not the "almost the same but a tiny bit less bad".

Democrats are supposed to walk towards Less Evil, thus opening up a political gap in the middle that also pulls the Republicans over towards Less Evil, but instead Democrats are walking towards More Evil, effectively making the baseline of American politics be Quite A Lot Of Evil and worsening, and supporting the normalization and even increasing extremism of the Evil in the Republican Party.

This isn't about the Present, because that war is lost and all that people have left is Resistance (and me not being in US means I can't be part of that), this is about the Future - if the Democrat leadership comes around to accept that their only chance is to actually be the opposite of Trump in actions, fighting for actual Principles, rather than merely be the slightly dissenting performative voice, then there is hope for improvement otherwise (as indicated by Trumps reelection after what he did last time in office) America is condemned to a cycle of presidents like Trump and worse.

People whitewashing Genocide-support as long as it's done by Democrats ain't gona push the Democrat leadership to start moving towards Less Evil.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (16 children)

Re-read the posts: plenty of people who criticize Biden are also criticizing Trump.

I can't speak for others but I personally am not constantly criticizing Trump because their is no lack of criticizing Trump here so it's not a problem I feel I need to address in my comments, much less do it all the time.

It's the whitewashing of the actions of Genociders that I feel is a problem so my comments are directed at that, and in this thread so far I've only seen the actions of one bunch of Genociders be whitewashed, and that's the Biden bunch.

If this was 4chan I'm sure there would be plenty of comments whitewashing Trump's actions that I would feel the need to counter.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (18 children)

I think the problem is so many people trying to politically point score by whitewashing a bunch of Genociders by using the actions of a new bunch of Genociders.

"Yeah, but our guys' mass murdering of children was all fairies and unicorns shitting rainbows from their arses whilst those other guys' Genocide is all dark and shit" isn't the Grand Principled argument the tribalists seem to think it is.

It's kind of understandable that anybody with enough Principle in their bodies to trump tribalism is a "little" peeved at people excusing any group of willful and eager collaborators in the mass murder of children, be it the previous bunch or the new bunch.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

Biden authorized sending 2000lb bombs.

Then it came out that such bombs were being sent and under pressure he paused the sending of those bombs.

Trump resumed it.

You're whitewashing Biden's part in the willful mass murder of civilians (the US Military itself refuses to use 2000lb bombs exactly because of their massive collateral damage and Israel was using them in an urban area thus maximizing the killing from said collateral damage) for political point scoring.

While you're claiming the other poster "sucks" for being critical of Biden's stance on this you might want to look at yourself in a mirror.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago

I'm not making an argument against it, just clarifying were it sits as technology.

As I see it, it's like electric cars - a technology that was overtaken by something else in the early days when that domain was starting even though it was the first to come out (the first cars were electric and the ICE engine was invented later) and which has now a chance to be successful again because many other things have changed in the meanwhile and we're a lot closes to the limits of the tech that did got widely adopted back in the early days.

It actually makes a lot of sense to improve the speed of what programming can do by getting it to be capable of also work outside the step-by-step instruction execution straight-jacked which is the CPU/GPU clock.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

FPGAs have been a thing for ages.

If I remember it correctly (I learned this stuff 3 decades ago) they were basically an improvement on logic circuits without clocks (think stuff like NAND and XOR gates - digital signals just go in and the result comes out on the other side with no delay beyond that caused by analog elements such as parasitical inductances and capacitances, so without waiting for a clock transition).

The thing is, back then clocking of digital circuits really took off (because it's WAY simpler to have things done one stage at a time with a clock synchronizing when results are read from one stage and sent to the next stage, since different gates have different delays and so making sure results are only read after the slowest path is done is complicated) so all CPU and GPU architecture nowadays are based on having a clock, with clock transitions dictating things like when is each step of processing a CPU/GPU instruction started.

Circuits without clocks have the capability of being way faster than circuits with clocks if you can manage the problem of different digital elements having different delays in producing results I think what we're seeing here is a revival of using circuits without clocks (or at least with blocks of logic done between clock transitions which are much longer and more complex than the processing of a single GPU instruction).

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

They definitely used to go down, just not since Bitcoin morphed into a speculative mania.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I remember Xilinx from way back in the 90s when I was taking my EE degree, so they were hardly a fledgling in 2019.

Not disputing your overall point, just that detail because it stood out for me since Xilinx is a name I remember well, mostly because it's unusual.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

That probably also means that when the trend reverses it will turn into a rout.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's totally not believable.

Blue shirt didn't even mention Arch!

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

Making generalized statements about ideas held and behaviours on all people born in a certain geographical location or with certain skin color is Racial Prejudice because it's anchored on the idea that people born in a certain area or with the genes to express a certain skin color "Are all the same", which is pure Prejudice (you're presuming belifs and actions for a large number of individual human beings based on how they look and were the were born, both things they were born with and thus not of their choice and none of which things that they actually chose and did)

Racism is equally Racism for all geographical locations or skin colors being targetted and only a Racist would think that it's less bad to target some skin colors or geographical locations than others.

view more: ‹ prev next ›