AE5NE

joined 11 months ago
[–] AE5NE@lemmy.radio 9 points 7 months ago

I think they limit your total ammo inventory in some Nordic country. You have to bring back casings to buy more ammo - solves two problems.

[–] AE5NE@lemmy.radio 31 points 7 months ago

Probably dedicated vector/tensor coprocessors these days - which don’t have to work with your monitor layout or desktop setup!

[–] AE5NE@lemmy.radio 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Now I think my client (Memmy) is wonky too, because it can’t follow any of these links! Will try the web UI.

[–] AE5NE@lemmy.radio 4 points 8 months ago

Ah, I read the requestor as wanting to disallow body text.

[–] AE5NE@lemmy.radio 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Maybe the instance I’m on is wonky, because I can’t even find those communities - I just get the “top”/”default” type communities ala reddit: technology, news, etc, which are all linked mass media articles.

[–] AE5NE@lemmy.radio 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The opposite of that request, yes.

[–] AE5NE@lemmy.radio 4 points 8 months ago

More policy and culture than implementation. Rarely see pages of links to mass media sites on your average phpBB, though.

[–] AE5NE@lemmy.radio 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I have thought for a while that the next “reddit” should be usenet with a client having advanced filtering, local scoring, etc. Maybe where the client reports to/reads from a shared spam database.

[–] AE5NE@lemmy.radio 4 points 8 months ago (9 children)

I dont mean a chat/conversation-specific community, I mean a collection of communities that are more people interacting than links being posted.

Especially for hobby, parenting, philosophy, politics, technical discussions, etc.

 

It seems like any platform that features link aggregation is soon overrun by bots and self-promoters trying to drive traffic, and pages and pages of link posts versus pages and pages of people talking.

Are there any lemmy instances or other defederated networks that focus on Q&A, niche communities, and people conversing, instead?