this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45730 readers
26 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 0 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I'm curious about your agile theory now !

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago (5 children)
[–] manicdave@feddit.uk 0 points 5 months ago

What is impact engineering though? If it's it's just agile while being cognisant of technical debt over MVPs, I don't know if it's necessarily that different.

It seems the study was designed to sell a book and I can't find anything about what that book says. I should probably read it but the bait way it's being sold makes me resistant to paying to find out.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

What a shit measure. A key idea is to fail fast and fail often, as this leads to faster growth through more frequent (re)assessment.

SW companies only care about profit. If failure rate is 268% higher but profit is simultaneously 10% higher, then Agile is the better choice.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 5 months ago

According to a company trying to sell its Agile replacement.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

It's much better to deliver useless projects afterall.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] manicdave@feddit.uk 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

It's half way to self management.

Software exists in a world that kind of exists outside of property. Cynics like to think that Agile got big because as some kind of fad because the kids love it, but the reality is that fully hierarchical models just cannot keep up with self organising teams.

The old model - the model that most of the rest of the world of work still uses - simply cannot compete on a level playing field where the means of production (a cheap computer) are available to all. A landowner can stop you building your own house, but Microsoft can't really stop you building your own software, so they still have to put in work to collect rent.

Imagine what we could accomplish as a species if the goals and distribution of resources were also decided democratically.

[–] scoutFDT@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

Microsoft can't stop you from building software...... yet.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago (6 children)

shoutout to the person who reported this post with "Reason: Bot meme, you can't even read it. whoever replies is a bot too" 😂

[–] manicdave@feddit.uk 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] Prox@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

beep beep boop

FTFY

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago

What's funny is they could have made an actually funny joke about marxists.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago
[–] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Beep boop, comrade.

-pinko bot probably

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fargeol@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Skepticpunk@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Hmm. Self-organizing projects whose workers work on them entirely based on their need to be done, and the results freely distributed to anyone who wants a copy?

Literal fascism, obviously.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

whose workers work on them entirely based on their need to be done

You mean there's projects out there where it's not a bunch of individual devs all working on their personal pet features and ignoring all else?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Things like FOSS stuff makes you think people can organize and work together freely to achieve a common goal, and maybe anarchy could work. But then, you see a busy intersection when the traffic lights go out and you realize the general public are idiots and everything devolves into selfish chaos as you're stuck a half mile back, as cars shoot through in no particular order and you inch closer to the madness terrified to make your left turn. I have zero trust in society without some form of rule and order.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Decentralization doesn't necessarily mean disorganization. You can create a Lemmy instance with no moderation and rely purely on the community itself to self moderate, much like someone can create an instance with rules, and if someone disagrees with the rules they can create their own. Both are part of a decentralized system, so no one is actually coerced into participating in any system by regulation, just social pressure.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Think about a roundabout though in comparison, no lights or specific order, and there is a learning curve, but overall they reduce traffic better then stoplights under many conditions.

I guess my point is sort of extrapolating that a structure/presentation also heavily influences how users perceive or use a product/idea

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Agile is the anarchism of software development: sounds nice on a high level but basically no theoretical foundation behind it and thus everybody makes it whatever the fuck they want it to be.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Lemmy's biggest mistake was not calling federations "communes" or "syndicates"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Ah yes, nyehh

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)

All this "communism is fascism" bullshit is as toxic as "if you vote for 3rd party your voting for trump".

Fucking liberals.

[–] yyyesss@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Isn't "communism" essentially authorianism? I'd love to see true communism in action but humans tend to be too flawed to give up all that power.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago (12 children)

Authoritarianism is an empty label since it's used against one's opposing ideologies. Rarely if ever is the inherent authoritarianism of the current or any system of government acknowledged.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›