this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

27958 readers
525 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Verge and 404 Media are building out new functions that would allow them to distribute posts on their sites and on federated platforms – like Threads, Mastodon and Bluesky – at the same time. Replies to those posts on those platforms become comments on their sites.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

I’d be really happy about anything bringing more people on Lemmy and the Fediverse, so I wouldn’t complain about it.

Maybe I’m not seeing the big picture as some people seem to be scared of such a move.

[–] DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I love 404 Media. I wish i had enough disposable income to support them.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wait their articles are paywalled. Are they only going to federate the clickbait teaser intros?

[–] Metz@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Wait their articles are paywalled.

Journalists have to pay for food and rent too. What is the alternative? ads?

The money has to come from somewhere.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Paywalls just don't mix that well with federation. The teasers are basically ads, and why would fediverse volunteers want to propagate some company's ads? The non-federated model they are using now seems fine.

[–] mulcahey@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I didn't read Solrize's comment as saying "There shouldn't be paywalls," just asking the very legitimate question as to how they will interact with federation.

Interestingly, 404 just solved something kinda related: they developed a way for subscribers to get a custom RSS feed address, so they can access paywalled articles directly in their RSS reader. TMK, they are the first publication to do this. I imagine they would do something similar for federation. (I believe that if any of the custom RSS feeds show huge traffic numbers, 404 shuts it down, but I'm not sure)

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

I don't think that's new, you just need to throw in a personal subscription key in the URL

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago

The money comes from the companies that are hiring them to do the journalist work. Of course.

Let's be intellectually honest here. If a company has enough money that the boss can brand themself as "CEO" then it can pay at least living wages.

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 1 points 4 months ago

If they do that, they can no longer complain that Meta is freeloading on them and get themselves banned by Meta like they did in Canada...

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au -1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

How about corporations fuck off? Let us have our own small slice of people own and ran Internet back again.

[–] YourAvgMortal@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The nice thing about the fediverse is that you could start your own instance and not federate with them

[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

...or block them.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah but now they have to play by our rules or get defederated. We are no longer at the mercy of profit motives.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I see no problem with this, if they federate instances can choose to pick them up or not