this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Memes

45317 readers
83 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the_doktor@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Meat industry: have to ramp up production because fucking idiotic people continue to breed uncontrollably and unsustanably

disease starts spreading and affecting the industry

Smug-ass cultist vegans: MuSt Be ThE mEaT eAtErS!!!1 Come on, my wife Moon Seashell, we need to get you pregnant again because our 14 malnourished kids isn't enough!

[–] Zacryon@lemmy.wtf 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

True, increased demand for meat is one of the driving factors of ecological malpractise as it's found in the meat industry.

Plant based diets and a lifestyle free of animal products provide a more sustainable and ecologically beneficial alternative. As does reducing the overall world population of course.

[–] the_doktor@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago (4 children)

A lifetime free of animal products is not sustainable. Humans need at least some meat to survive. The average person eats too much which isn't helping. Advocating a vegan (or even vegetarian) diet is ignoring science and how our bodies function. It causes long-term, serious harm to people who do not supplement their diet with at least some meat.

Pure veganism is a cult that ignores science, diet, and common sense. Nothing wrong with eating vegan meals (I love them) but completely cutting out meat is bad for you.

[–] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

ignores science

Can you provide some links to that science?

[–] the_doktor@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Every single unbiased description of a human being ever. Don't bother with your vegan-funded "health" organizations who just want to kill us.

It's funny how every single vegan comes after me whenever I say the obvious fact that we need meat. Almost like they are a cult and want to hide the truth. The reason I come after vegans is because it's dangerous and abusive and unhealthy, not because of some programmed agenda that has to be carefully hidden by a death cult.

[–] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm not vegan, I eat meat. I ask for evidence because you're clearly biased and using emotionally charged and unscientific language when you dismiss the vegan diet. So I don't believe you have a real understanding of the science or potential nutritional complications.

Don't bother replying with "it's just common sense" reworded for a third time. If you can't provide evidence, that's fine, but you don't need to keep going on your dramatic crusade against something you don't understand in the comments. I'm not asking for your opinion.

[–] the_doktor@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What evidence do you want? The tons of descriptions about human beings in our entire history isn't enough for you? The fact that our teeth, our digestive system, and every single part of us is engineered to require meat? You can't argue against science, because you're just wrong if you do. All of these "studies" are doing is trying to rally against established science. This isn't opinion. This isn't some "dramatic crusade". This is fact. You are the one that cannot and will not understand facts. And I don't care if you claim to eat meat, you're apparently arguing against it which goes against what you say you are doing which makes me believe that you're lying just to make people think you're "objective" and "open minded" when you're anything but.

We are omnivores. This is a fact. We need at least some meat to live well. This is a fact. I have never claimed that vegetarian or vegan meals are bad for you. I have never claimed that we need to eat a ton of meat; on the contrary, I believe we do eat too much meat as a society and can cut back quite a bit. But cutting it out entirely? No. That's wrong. That goes against everything we are as human beings.

I don't know what else I can tell you. If you still are hung up on your vegan bullshit, I have nothing else to say because you're just brainwashed and in a cult. It's that simple.

[–] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I want literally any evidence. You are clearly incapable of providing any to support your even most basic claim. I'm not arguing against meat, I'm arguing against ignorance and dishonesty. I had rotisserie chicken from Walmart for lunch. If you had provided any source for your claim, I would have read it fully and with an open mind. I'm not biased towards veganism, I wanted to know if the claims you are making have any basis in reality so I can make an informed decision. This is your third comment saying the same thing without evidence, and arguing like a child. I don't mean that to be derogatory either, if you're still in school or a child, that's fine. But I'm not interested in a discussion at that level.

You have shown repeatedly that you can't have an honest discussion and are close minded and conspiratorial. I'm not going to bother replying anymore, it's just getting obnoxious.

[–] the_doktor@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Instead of constantly badgering me here, maybe try a search or two to get a flood of actual, unbiased proof that vegan diets are unhealthy. Ever think of that? Because that's what I did when vegans started claiming your bullshit.

And tell me this: if you're so fucking convinced vegans are right, why did you eat meat? Hmm? Because you didn't. You're a brainless, starving for actual substance vegan cosplaying as an omnivore trying to gain any shred of credibility. Fuck off.

[–] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

I'm not convinced vegans are right. If you're so convinced that I'm lying, why do you keep replying? Are you just trolling or do you have anger issues?

And if you can't provide me with a single link to back up your own claim, then I don't believe you have spent a single second researching unbiased proof.

[–] Zacryon@lemmy.wtf 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Humans need at least some meat to survive. [...] It causes long-term, serious harm to people who do not supplement their diet with at least some meat. [...] completely cutting out meat is bad for you.

That is not correct.

Advocating a vegan (or even vegetarian) diet is ignoring science and how our bodies function. [...] Pure veganism is a cult that ignores science, diet, and common sense.

To the contrary. It is very much supported by science. Are you interested in the scientific literature? I'll happily share.

[–] the_doktor@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's impossible to trust any sources these days because there are hidden agendas. The fact remains: we are omnivores and have shown to have used meat to evolve to current humans with high intelligence.

No amount of "scientific literature" can contradict actual, basic, fundamental science about who we are and what we are supposed to eat. Anyone who does has an agenda.

[–] Zacryon@lemmy.wtf 0 points 4 months ago

It's impossible to trust any sources these days because there are hidden agendas. [...] No amount of "scientific literature" can contradict actual, basic, fundamental science about who we are and what we are supposed to eat. Anyone who does has an agenda.

Sounds more like, "I don't like it, so it must be an agenda".

If you have issues trusting science we won't come to an agreement here. Having a biased view and choosing what you want to believe, despite contradicting evidence, is building an illusion and not having an accurate picture of reality.

Note that research on that topic has not just popped up in the last couple of years. Also you may take a look at other cultures for hands-on counterexamples, e.g. some monks who live and have lived their whole lifes without consuming animal products.

The fact remains: we are omnivores

I wonder how you decide what a "fact" is, since you have issues trusting the work of scientists.
Anyway:
The fact also remains that digestion capabilites, i.e. being able to eat both plant and animal matter, don't necessarily impose dietary recommendations.

What you need to survive is a set of nutrients your body can digest. In which form they come, is less important.

[–] Soulcreator@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So precisely how long are vegans able to survive without suffering ill effects? Because I mean we've all heard of people who have lived on that diet long term, so at what point do the wheels start to fall off so to speak? Is there some kind of extended latency period where you are okay before you get sick, or are vegan influencers just pretending to be healthy?

Also your how do you propose we change our agricultural practices so that our food supply isn't tainted by sick meat grown in poor conditions? There's a lot of evidence that there's not enough land mass on earth to feed everyone a diet of free range grass fed beef. Or do you propose we run full steam ahead with factory farming and damn the consequences?

[–] the_doktor@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No vegan has lived on a pure vegan diet long enough to not have severe issues. If you search you will find tons of former vegans who were forced off of their pure vegan diets by severe medical issues. People who call themselves "vegans" and are still doing well after a long time are either really vegetarians who eat a lot of animal-derived products to compensate, or cheat and eat meat here and there.

[–] Soulcreator@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Yes i understand what you are getting at there, but my question is precisely how long does one have before the wheels fall off while eating a strict vegan diet? Are we talking a matter of days, weeks, months, years, or decades?

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes humans evolved to eat everything. Now let me just cut a part of that diet out of my life.

[–] the_doktor@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We evolved to NEED to eat everything, plants AND animals. Basic science, vegan cultist. You're a death cult and just as bad as religion, spreading unhealthy bullshit to people who don't know any better.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You know what's funny?

People say that like forever. And those "vegan cultists" we told that 3 decades ago (and we were waiting for them to die of malnutrition) are still healthy and happy while the average supermarket-joe got fat and unhappy or is long dead by now.

I'm no vegan btw. but why would i argue with science? Just because we evolved to be able to eat nearly everything doesn't mean we should. We could probably survive a good while on just eating hoofs or tree bark. Doesn't mean we should include it in our diet.

[–] the_doktor@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Science says meat contains proteins and nutrients that are incredibly difficult to get and get enough of in plants to live well.

In case you were unaware, it was the fact that we became meat-eating omnivores that is the REASON we evolved to become the intelligent creatures we are. Do vegans want to de-evolve into basic, stupid creatures? Seems that way.

I swear, people like you do nothing but spread misinformation and I'm fucking sick of it. Veganism is a laughable, horrible, unsafe, dangerous cult and you actually defend it.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Science doesn't say we need meat. Also very specially not the crappy processed toxic waste the majority consumes as "meat".

But ever tried a diet only existing of plants/fruits OR meat? Guess on which you'd live longer? Exactly.

And again, no vegan here. Just also sick of this super old "but science says we need meat".

[–] the_doktor@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

WE.

NEED.

BOTH.

YOU.

UNEDUCATED.

TWATWAFFLE.

"Lasting longer" on plants means we get the nutrition we need to barely continuously function on plants. That's like pushing around a car and claiming it still works. Our cognitive abilities and our core strength both rely on animal meat to run at their full capacity. And even with just plants, our health slowly deteriorates to the point where even that isn't enough any more. Look up the vast number of people online who have recanted their vegan vows because of severe health issues. People who say they're pure vegan and don't have issues are either vegetarian (which an added strong diet of eggs is a vast improvement over a pure vegan diet though not perfect) and/or cheat on their diet (which is much more likely).

You can't argue against science. It's pathetic. You're like the fucking flat earthers and god-lovers. Still clinging to an obsolete, bullshit, laughable belief in fucking 2024 when we should all be together in understanding how the world fucking works.

Get over yourself.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago

Who needs to get over whom? Probably the ad-hominem hero. Talking about science but behaving like an agitated chimp. Go work less and chill more 😁

I prefer civilized discussion, so... Have a nice life.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

We keep 10,000 chickens in a single huge building whose floor is literally layers of their old shit, give them just enough room to stand there and not move around, and leave it there without any environmental controls through the hottest days of the year. What do you mean disease is prevalent?

[–] Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago

Don't forget that we also feed the cows the chicken shit to cut costs!

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

You'd think the disease couldn't handle these conditions.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Then, when you try to legislate any kind of standard for humane livestock treatment, the farmers throw a hissy fit and block all the roads with their tractors.

[–] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It's not possible to produce the amount of meat needed to feed our massive population while treating animals humanely.

There are really two options to deal with this:

  1. Most humans in the world become vegan -- sounds great but it's not gonna happen

  2. Reduce our population to sustainable numbers (by eliminating the driver of the population explosion, i.e. fossil energy) -- maybe also not gonna happen

Edit: What (do I think) will happen? We'll continue as we are now as hundreds of billions of animals are tortured until our civilization collapses. This will happen because we were all brought up under a state and told that defending ourselves, our communities, our animals, is wrong and illegal.

[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

False dichotomy here. Americans could certainly reduce their intake of meat without going full vegan. Regulations could be created to treat livestock more humanely without completely eliminating factory farming, which yes would increase prices, which would probably also reduce meat consumption somewhat. Also population growth within the US has dropped off quite a bit and is projected to further decline.

[–] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

You're right, to some insufficient degree, but that's like reducing your meth habit.

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Was that due to animal welfare regulations? Thought it had to do with regulations favoring mega farms and forcing small farms to stop.

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

It wasn't. Hes being deliberately deliberately disingenuous

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

As a meat eater, it's shit like this which is why I've been buying more vegetarian shit. Every week there's a new food recall. People are getting real sick and dying.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Same here. I tried out blackbean burgers, plant-based hot dogs, tofu and almond milk in my last couple of grocery runs, just to see what's up. Turns out I really like tofu as a substitute for ground beef, and the veggie dogs tasted just like all beef franks to me. And none of these things were any more expensive than meat, so that's also a big plus.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you can find some TVP in the shape of a steak, that stuff is also insane to me.
Like, I'm kind of not qualified to actually compare it to a steak, but my body instantly gave me that vegetarian gag reflex when I first had it, because it has that same chewiness.

And yeah, it's really cheap. You can just have it in your cupboard for an eternity. And to prepare it, you just boil it in salt water / stock for a few minutes, press out the water and throw it into a hot pan to sear it like a steak.
The Maillard reaction does its thing and somehow this chunk of goddamn defatted soy beans does not taste healthy anymore.

[–] aulin@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Also making seitan from flour is super easy. If I could get my hands on pure gluten it would be insanely easy. Maybe not as rich in taste as soy meat, but so much cheaper than store bought meat analogues.

[–] rolaulten@startrek.website 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Which veggie dog worked for you? I can't find one that grills correctly.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They're from "Morning Star Farms," though I was careful to only say that they taste right, haha -- They don't plump up when cooked, and are prone to scorching in spots on the grill. But the flavor is spot on!

[–] Inui@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Might not be you specifically, but I think something a lot of people miss with a lot of premade vegan products like hotdogs and stuff is that they don't need to cooked. The burgers I get even say on the package "this is not meat" and suggest you're going to burn it if you treat it like it is. You're essentially just warming it up.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

True, but meat-based hot dogs are typically fully cooked and so only need to be warmed, too... Grilling is just kind of a fun activity for me, and it adds a little snap and smoky flavor that you can't get by boiling them. That said, grilled veggie dogs were a little different, but still pretty good!

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Same. Me too. When i buy meat, then it's only organic and the best ethical treatment I can find. And also waaaaaay less in general. It just became bad in every sense of way and plant-based stuff has gotten so much better over the last 3 decades.

Only thing that pisses me off is that the food my food eats is even more expensive for no apparent reason (edit: yes ofc i know the socio-economic reasons. As a consumer i just don't care. That's what i meant)

[–] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There's nothing ethical about exploiting and slaughtering an innocent living creature.

I'm not implying anything about your diet, just requesting you break free from the 'muh local farm humane' propaganda and stop deluding yourself.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago

I know. I was an animal rights activist once (in a time where "vegan" was either an insult or noone knew what it even was). Based on way too much knowledge about what we do with other beings.

And i didn't say "it's ethical", but a local farm where the cows got names and live a great life (up until they stop doing so) surely beats industrialized farming ethically. I doubt you wanna argue there, except you only can live in a binary world (harm/don't harm) . But that would be impossible as a vegan. Unless you're one (i just assumed) because it's fashionable or trendy or just edgy.

Btw something being "humane" doesn't really mean anything ethical. Being sadistic shit-sticks who rape the whole planet raw until there's nothing left is actuallly very "humane". No other species is that horribly aweful.

[–] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Meat and dairy are heavily subsidized by the government (at least in US). Government subsidies for animal agriculture allow them to sell for cheaper because they can sell for less than what it actually costs to make.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago

I know. Same here. Probably the same everywhere. But still pissing me off

[–] iiGxC@slrpnk.net 0 points 4 months ago

also "meat eaters: 😲"

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (4 children)

It is in part a consumer issue. Consumers want things as cheaply as possible, and companies that produce as cheaply as possible sell more product. We've seen the same issue with apparel; America wants cheap clothing, and so the mills in the US have largely closed, and most production has been moved overseas in order to make the final products cheap enough.

And while it's partly a consumer issue, the fact that wages haven't kept up with productivity--that is, more and more money is being skimmed out of the system by investors and executives rather than going to the workers--has been the driver towards making consumer goods more and more cheaply, simply because people have less purchasing power.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›