this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
60 points (95.5% liked)

Linux

47621 readers
659 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 27 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Sounds nice, but why use an Nvidia card in a purpose-built Linux box? Obviously they must have made it work well with their default OS options, but it just feels like extra hurdles for them to work through.

Also, why not support AMD for actually appearing to give a shit about Linux open-source drivers? I was a longtime Nvidia user but switched to AMD on my latest build. Given how much better everything seems to work out of the box, they've earned my loyalty for the foreseeable future.

[–] sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Amd can be quite hard to work with as a small vendor and even though they have a current product with them it takes alot of time, and money to get a new one. If they can

The excuse, which I believe, is that AMD is relatively small and can only do buisness with so many people Whereas nvidia is massive, and multiple smaller companies along with the main one will be in a much better place to supply GPUs.

Completely agree though, I would much prefer an all amd option.

[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago

That makes a lot of sense from a small-business perspective. I appreciate your insight.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

Because nvidia isn't as hard to get working as people pretend it is.

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 months ago

Maybe ODM they get devices from to rebrand does not have AMD option for this model? ツ

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not just Stellaris. But Stellaris with the last 17 DLCs.

[–] loo@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I love Stellaris, but I hate Paradox.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

i just gave up on it, the performance is unbearably slow on bigger games

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago

But Stellaris is a 2D strategy game, more CPU-bound?

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

€2,100 for the base model.

€4,200 for top of the line.

Why would I want to replace my desktop with this?

[–] TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Because you're a stupid consoomer. You can build a 4 liter ITX desktop that's cheaper, faster, more reliable and easier to repair than these stupid "desktop replacements". Plus for the price difference you can buy a "thin and lite" laptop so that you won't have to carry this monster around when you just need to reply to emails on the go.

edit: just to clarify I'm not saying you in particular are a stupid consoomer, just the person in the given example. People tend to get angry fast on the internet.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

laptops are only replacing desktops for me when they start making them modular