this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
461 points (98.3% liked)

Privacy

32120 readers
396 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here's a non-paywalled link to an article published in the Washington Post a few days ago. It's great to see this kind of thing getting some mainstream attention. Young children have not made an informed decision about whether they want their photos posted online.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 105 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Interesting how there are so many mentions of people worried about AI and only sharing photos in closed groups on Instagram/Facebook. I'm not sure that's actually keeping the photos away from AI.

I think a large part of their concern is AI-altered photos generated by an individual.

[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 18 points 7 months ago

Came here to say this. If you upload pictures to instagram, they are already being processed by Facebook ("Meta"). If you have an online backup of your photos Google/Apple cloud, then they are alredy being processed.

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The problem with posting pictures of kids in closed groups is that pervs will just join those groups because they have what they're looking for. You're basically making it easier for them.

It's not that parents are afraid of their kids being part of a training set, though that is a bad thing in and of itself. It's more about all of these AI undressing app ads that are showing up on every social media site, showing just how much of a wild-west situation things currently are, and that this brand of sexual exploitation is in-demand.

Predators are already automating the process so that certain Instagram models get the AI undressing treatment as soon as they upload an exploitable pic. Pretty trivial to do at scale with Instaloader, GroundingDINO, SAM, and SD. Those pics are hosted outside of Instagram where victims have no power to undo the damage. Kids will get sexually exploited in this process, incidentally or intentionally.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 67 points 7 months ago (6 children)

I really hope it becomes the new normal to stop posting everything about ourselves non-anonymously online in general. But especially photos and information about kids. I am hopeful that in the near future, we'll all look back and say "What the fuck were we thinking? We all looked like narcissists exploiting our kids for likes!"

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Growing up at the dawn of the internet, this was considered normal. You stay anonymous online because you don’t know who the person on the other end of the screen is. What changed?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml 56 points 7 months ago (7 children)

As the internet gets scarier

How the fuck is the internet getting scarier? This isn't the random gore and porn filled, go to a forum and immediately get targeted by a sex-predator, internet that I grew up with. The internet is a corporate walled garden of mega services that feed disinformation and bullshit to people, but your odds of getting genuinely victimized as a child are so much lower than they used to be.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 24 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think it is just a different scary. It is less predators snatching you up in their white van and more social media is totally screwing with people's heads. It is more addictive than ever before. People are have para social relationships with online personalities. All photos you see online have been edited and changed to make them look better. Creating huge body image issues. And that is just the stuff I can think of off the top of my head.

And the preditor in the white van hasn't actually gone away. Their have been some very questionables things over the years that have gotten some news coverage. Spiderman and Elisa shit, some very very questionable Musicly/TikTok video with kids, I have heard about some kids doing ASMR videos. Minecraft YouTubers seem to always end up grooming some kids.

Bottom line the Internet be scary. Stay safe and definitely don't let kids be unattended.

[–] TwoCubed@feddit.de 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Lol, no. Very accessible AI tools can make the pictured kids do whatever the fuck the creator wants. It's easier than ever to steal identities and ruin lives. The internet still is full of porn and gore but that hardly is the problem. Also, brainwashing via social media is a really big and scary problem. The internet absolutely is scarier then aver before.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Azal@pawb.social 10 points 7 months ago

IMO the "getting scarier" is the swinging back part. Grew up in the same time, my parents were big on "No identifying information to anyone on the internet!" I joke with them now that their generation, the ones that told us to stay off post all their business on facebook and the like.

But that's the thing, you have a small segment of society that was the internet nerds that didn't trust anything on the internet, hid themselves and the like, but now like you say it's the corporate walled garden that's sanitized and happy, which makes that veneer of trust. And boy do people trust it, posting anything and everything.

Odds are lower in percentages of being genuinely victimized as a child, but the lack of paying attention what's posted has lead to a lot of effects, so people are getting worried again.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It was explained in the first paragraph:

A month after her son was born, Samantha Taylor, 30, and her husband came to a realization: They didn’t want photos of their child posted online. They worried about how quickly artificial intelligence was advancing and how the photos could be used in addition to “creeps online in general.

[–] tuhriel@infosec.pub 7 points 7 months ago

Those where more, how should I put it, 'visual' and 'tangible' threads. Now it's watch out or someone is aggregating all your infornation about you and will use it for some neferarious things...
Which I find is a much wider issue, but is also much more dificult to warn and protect.

[–] CrabLangEnjoyer@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

It's not, it's just that with enough mainstream media coverage about scary internet stories normies are slowly waking up to what the internet is and how you should conduct yourself on it. Of course any terminally online person could have told you that 20 years ago but those are not most people. Hell even if you do know better good luck convincing your family, I know I tried for years with negligible results other than one of them now using a password manager.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 30 points 7 months ago (4 children)

On the flip side, search for "mom run" or "parent run" on Instagram to see the kids whose parents have decided to parade in front of thousands of people online. Usually moms posting their little girls in leotards and swimsuits for their mostly mostly adult male followers... 🤢🤮

But don't worry, Meta isn't complicit, if you search "child model" they give you a scary child abuse warning message.

Someone else on Lemmy pointed this out a while back, and after seeing it for myself that firmly solidified my decision to stay the fuck away from anything Meta does.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Run as in "mom runs this account".

"Mom managed" also gets results.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's weird the parents that are complicit in this, like how do they justify it in their mind? I had a girlfriend in high school whose mom encouraged her to post risque photos online in 8th grade, taking photos of her with her thong out posing seductively etc, she wanted her daughter to be hot. Maybe the parents are trying to relive their youth vicariously.

But you are right, worse than the random parents encouraging this, the platforms knowingly encourage this sexualization of children because they know the ad revenue it can generate.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 29 points 7 months ago

My friends keep my photos offline too.

Anything that's genuinely good, is good in more ways than just "for the children".

[–] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Is the internet scarier?

Or is it just millennials and "internet natives" having kids and more of them knowing better what the internet actually is.

I tell people to imagine a public place with everyone in it, the majority wearing masks or costumes. With constantly recording surveillance. Do you take off your mask.

Sure the mask is not perfect protection, and there are areas off to the side where people seem to not be wearing masks. But go ahead and choose a way to keep your kids safe.

[–] eveninghere@beehaw.org 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Still on iCloud, Google Drive and OneDrive. No way these people know how to store photos offline on their phone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Here in Belgium it's been pretty much the norm, both in friends groups or in institutions like schools that ask more formally, that one does not post photos online without the consent of all participants, including that of kids and their guardians. This is particularly the case for sharing publicly e.g Facebook post but also WhatsApp group.

It's a mess but habits are changing at scale.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My mama taught me back in the day to never use your real name online. Now, multiple decades later, I laugh at people who are my age and just now learning that lesson.

[–] RippleEffect@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Anything with your name on it should be very controlled and curated. Anything you said 10 years ago can and likely will be used against you.

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

At our place we only share photos of the kids with grandparents/aunts/uncles via group chat. They’re the only group that “necessarily” needs to see the kids.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Let me guess, the group chat is WhatsApp or iMessage, so Facebook or Apple gets to see them too.

[–] A_N_O_N@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago

And their " legitimate partners"

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not even close—it’s Skype! We aren’t able to teach a 98yo great grandma to use something else from overseas, so Microsoft gets the cake.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 7 months ago

Well its better that posting it publicly

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Storing offline is great and all, but I hope everyone is storing on multiple disks at multiple locations....

Yer didn't think so, I'm sure photos are being lost.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Everyone loses data once before they understand how important backups are.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

If only that happening once was enough to learn from our mistakes.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I share via Signal, and with links to my Immich instance (sent over Signal). Certainly susceptible to security problems since yours truly set it up, but what you gonna do...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (5 children)

I have not posted a single photo of my kids on any platform for this reason. My wife on the other hand thinks I'm overly paranoid, so thanks to her, Zuck has a ton of photos of them...

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Here's a real screenshot from Instagram.

[–] pero@lemm.ee 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is that a porn genAI ad next to photos of underage kids? 💀

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I share my photos with friends and family using a normal webhost.

I used to upload my artsy photos to DeviantArt, but a year ago I had enough with how slow it had become, so I set up my own small lightweight website using a simple HTML/CSS menu and galleries generated by digiKam that also uses very light jacascript for navigation.

It is blazingly fast and private enough for me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] root@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I recently found out about Circles and was hoping to migrate friends and family to it, but it's just too much of a learning curve to get things set up.

[–] tuckerm@supermeter.social 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (8 children)

That looks cool, I hadn't heard of Circles before. I want to check it out now. I'm curious if it somehow keeps your data private from the server owner. That feels like the missing feature in most federated, privacy-focused social networks.

Side note: looks like it's made by Futo; I hadn't realized they were working on something like that. I've been using another one of their apps, Grayjay for almost all of my mobile Youtube viewing lately. It works great.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nicoag@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago (12 children)

Managing digital photos is quite hard to do reliably.

Where do you store them? Optical disc, it might get mushrooms; HDD, mechanism might fail; SSD or flash, this one's better but it might get corrupted, and so on.

Cloud services provide a convenient solution to all this, than apart from the service going down (which is less likely) have no other issues. You can also access them wherever you are.

Privacy is an important concern. It would be nice to have them encrypted on cloud. Encrypted from a local and trusted (open source) client, that is also convenient. If each time I want to show a photo to my granny I have to download and gpg a file manually, I pass.

But most people don't care about their privacy at all anyways, so why bother.

[–] Dymonika@kbin.social 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Optical disc, it might get mushrooms

Um... what?

[–] young_broccoli@fedia.io 10 points 7 months ago

I think they mean disc rot

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Syncthing!

Android Phone/Linux/Windows/Mac/iOS clients. Simply sync your photos to all of your devices, if you only have the one device, use a trusted friend and cross sync....

Don't bother with cloud.

Also Signal groups for sharing with those that matter.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 4 points 7 months ago

If you don't care about privacy, you're probably blasé about backup, but if you have backups it's as simple as 3-2-1...

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›