this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
168 points (91.2% liked)

[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation

6590 readers
1 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 55 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Is that how you are supposed to read paper books?

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Lol I read all three formats. I have shit ton of physical books in my home and I have a serious buying issue where always buying more books and read them. And thanks to my library I have a Libby account and so far read over 26 books just through my kindle alone. Lastly I listen to audiobooks anytime I behind the wheel commuting to work or just driving. I just love to read and also love to write.

[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

Interesting diatribe that doesn't answer the question at all lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bort@sopuli.xyz 47 points 8 months ago (11 children)

e-reader were a gamechanger for me.

on one side they are super convinient, because of the backlight alone.

on the other side: piracy

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] cloudless@feddit.uk 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Audio books. When I have a book in my hand, I try to reach for a screen.

When I have a screen, I waste time with games/Lemmy/Youtube/Netflix etc instead of reading books.

But I can listen to audio books when I am walking/driving/cooking etc.

[–] skylestia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 8 months ago

i'm similar but for me i prefer physical books because if i'm reading a physical book i'm probably not sitting near any of my devices so there's less chance i'll get distracted lol

but audio book is a strong second because ya i can do other stuff while listening to it, the same way i listen to podcasts and stuff

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I adore real life books, but I read at night whilst my partner sleeps. The backlit ereader is an absolute delight.

I also disagree with calling audio books "reading".

I'm not saying is is a worse way to experience the content of the book, and I enjoy it myself, but it is a fundamentally different experience based on different senses and different mechanisms.

[–] Cipher22@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As someone who had an almost decade-long gap between Wheel of Time books because my ADHD no longer permitted book reading at a certain point, I would respectfully disagree. Audio books have been a God Send in the last few years, discovering I can still enjoy past pleasures in full by exploiting myself in circumstances that are beneficial. Audio books have me back part of my life I had accepted as lost forever.

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, you miaunderstand me.

You can still enjoy the content, but the process isn't reading that's all.

I enjoy them too. Audio books are great. Several members of my family are blind and it is a form we can enjoy.

Interestingly the fact that several people can enjoy an audiobook at once supports my argument that it is not reading... A somewhat solo pursuit unless someone reads aloud.

So, respectfully, I think you've got the wrong end of this stick.

But I do want to say that it gives me genuine pleasure that you've found a way to enjoy those stories.

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Would you say that someone reading printed out lyrics is listening to music?

Maybe if they were looking at a musical score? Is that listening to music?

I'd suggest it is a way of experience it. But it certainly isn't listening to it.

I think reading is the same.

Audio books are not worse, not lesser, but they are different and that's why I'd say they are not reading.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago

Ereaders definitely. I hate audiobooks because they take so long to read, I prefer listening to music when travelling. And physical books take up so much physical space, besides ebooks' added benefits such as customisable brightness for reading in the dark, remembering the page, highlighting and copying/defining/searching for text, and more.

[–] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 12 points 8 months ago

I love the thought of paper books, but the functionality of my eReader is just too great. I can carry my books with me in one tiny little thing, it's got a light built in and doesn't weigh too much. Also saves so much shelf space.

[–] Elaine@lemm.ee 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Audiobooks, I listen while I’m working. I like paper books too, it’s lovely to sink into the pages. I don’t like reading stuff on a screen because I was born too soon.

[–] Wandering_Uncertainty@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I used to love physical books, but I just can't do them anymore. It's eBooks all the way - on my phone, namely.

I love to read so much and the ability to have my book on me at all times is irresistible. Going to the bathroom? Waiting at the doctor's office? A few minutes break at work? Snuggling in bed at night and I don't want to turn on a light and disturb my partner?

I've tried a few times to read physical books in the last few years, and having gotten addicted to the pleasure of reading whenever the hell I want, I just can't anymore.

Audiobooks are great for long car drives, but I rarely do those, so they're a very occasional treat for me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 11 points 8 months ago

Ebook these days.

I borrow digital copies from my library. If I really love a book, and I know I'll re-read it, then Ill by a hard copy.

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Paper.

Ebooks are a tolerable alternative if there is no paper available.

I'm a fairly fast reader so audiobooks are way too slow paced for me and I don't like when they attempt to put emotions into their readings it always comes off as too inauthentic.

But that's just me, I'm a picky reader.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chai@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 8 months ago

Ereaders. They're light, have adjustable font size, can hold an extensive catalogue of books and have less distractions, in comparison to using a tablet with an ereader app on it.

Moreover, they allow me to escape international shipping fees which have really risen over the years.

On the other hand, nothing compares to the smell of a book and the sensation of holding one in your hand. I wish I could had hardcopies of some my ebooks for times when I want to get away from tech.

[–] livus@kbin.social 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I like the first two and use both regularly.

Audiobooks are torture because the human voice doesn't read at even hald the pace of the human eye so it. feels. like. being. drip. fed. Even when you speed it up to x2.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I really appreciate the ability to reference terms and characters with an e-reader.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Me reading in the dark without having to hold the crease of a book, reading on my side with my ebook: yeah I think I can pick a favorite

[–] Oiconomia@feddit.de 8 points 8 months ago

I was a strong e-reader user for a few years around 2012, but have gone back to paper books. I like the feel of them and also like having books as physical objects in my big book shelfs in my living room. It's a bit of the decoration and signaling aspect of it too. Yet from pure practicality the e-reader was way more convenient.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

e readers! Open Dyslexic font lets me read so fast!

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

OpenDyslexic is a free typeface/font designed to mitigate some of the common reading errors caused by dyslexia. The typeface was created by Abbie Gonzalez, who released it through an open-source license. The design is based on DejaVu Sans, also an open-source font.

TIL there's a dyslexic friendly font!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sekrayray@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Audiobooks. So amazing to be able to “read” while you’re doing other things that are required of you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Vej@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

As a dyslexic, audio books are awesome.

[–] klemptor@startrek.website 7 points 8 months ago

Paper books always. I have a second-gen kindle and I hate it. The reading experience is so inferior and I hate having to charge the stupid thing.

[–] MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

I need an E-reader that smells like a paper book!

I've never listened to an audiobook, but I'm about tied on physical vs E-reader books finished.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago

As someone with hearing issues (I lose speaking tones completely) I prefer books. Nothing better than curling up with a good book and hiding from the world for a while.

[–] Asclepiaz@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Audiobooks all the way. I'm a crafter so I like to paint, knit, crochet, cross stitch or quilt while listening. Not possible with tangible books. I've listened to the whole Wheel of Time series and all of Brandon Sanderson's cosmere novels.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

E-Reader. I had a Kindle I never really used, until pandemic. It was great to sometime reading again, to “go to the library” without leaving the house

I just tried an audiobook for the first time and it was not a good experience. Or maybe it’s just YouTube not being a good experience. Too many ads, it doesn’t want to keep track of what you read or where you were in it, nor does there seem to be a way to go back

[–] Conyak@lemmy.tf 6 points 8 months ago

I prefer a paper book but love my e-reader for travel. Packing several books into my carryon bag sucks.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Fuck paper books marry audiobooks and kill ebooks

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Truffle@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago

My favorite is paper. I love the smell of old books, but also, I download a ton too because it is easier to carry them around this way.

[–] faltryka@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago

Paper books in the evening, audio books on my commute each day.

[–] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

E-reader because being able to set the font and brightness so I don't get eye fatigue.

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (8 children)

I love ereaders. I can pull them out at any time, I can take thousands of books with me at any time, I can read at night without issue, if I drop my reader in the pool it’s not such a big deal. If I drop my book case in the pool it’s all damaged and everyone is giving me weird looks for bringing a book case to the pool.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Bebo@literature.cafe 5 points 8 months ago

Ebooks. I love how I can carry my entire book library on my phone with me everywhere I go. And read books on my phone anytime, anywhere. Also do enjoy audiobooks. Though they tend to take up lot of space, compared to ebooks.

[–] Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Can I be a little bit of a shit and say none?

It's not that I don't like books or am proud of not reading - it's that my ADHD makes books damn near impossible unless I'm fully gripped immediately, and then I will hyperfixate and read the book in it's entirety in one day (ask me about the bender that was the Girl With the Dragon Tattoo series). And one would think audiobooks would be the solution, but man they just bore me hahaha.

Radio plays (or podcasts in the same style) and deep dives into history, however? That's the spot.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

My preference has changed over time.

Originally I went through stacks of books. Even when ereaders came out I didn't like them. I built two massive floor to ceiling bookcases to hold them all. It's full with most shelves doubled up.

Then I started traveling all over the globe and I couldn't pack enough books for two weeks and 20+ flights. So I got an ereader and eventually transitioned to a tablet. Last I counted I have around 10,000 e-books.

Recently audiobooks have been my go-to. I drive a lot for work now so I listen to them on my trucks speaker system. When I am home I am always doing something else like cooking dishes, yardwork, etc. I have gotten use to listening to a book through my earbuds as I do other things. In the evening I often relax and listen to a book while playing a video game. I will go through 20-30 audiobooks per month.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 5 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I will die on this hill: listening is not reading. And I love listening to audio books when I have a long drive or something. ereader is what I use 99% of the time though.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 5 points 8 months ago

E-readers are too convenient, especially with how quickly I go through books.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sagrotan@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Audiobooks. Sounds strange, but I actually haven't got 3 or 4 hours to read a book. Even half an hour a day is a stretch. When I was in my 20s i'd lay down with a bucket of graphic novels and books and didn't stand up, only for snacks and toilet. Can't do that anymore. When I lay down and begin to read I'm sleeping after 10 minutes. Guess I'm a bit busy in my 40s.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I tried audiobooks but I couldn't last more than 30 minutes without my mind wondering somewhere else.

Started with physical books in the 90s now I read ebooks on my phone. Hoping to buy a dedicated ebook reader someday.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›