Better squeeze in just a few more exploitative long contracts before UEFA or FIFA steps in
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
16 points (94.4% liked)
Football (Soccer fútbol fußball 足球 )
5655 readers
10 users here now
Here for discussion of all things association football/soccer!
Rules
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No porn.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- No piracy
Other Football/Soccer Related Communities
- Eredivisie
- MLS
- Football Manager
- Ajax FC
- Arsenal FC
- Chelsea FC
- Liverpool FC
- Tottenham Hotspur FC
- US National Woman’s Soccer League
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Have the rules around amortising over a max of 5 years not come in yet?
It seems a bizarre way or circumventing the rules given it is so risky, surely? I could understand it in a sport where the team was less important, the individual more so (possibly baseball?), as it is maybe less likely that a player loses value. The Premier League is littered with players being overpaid and difficult to offload, signed on high contracts by optimistic clubs. Giving relatively unproven players 8 year contracts seems to be asking for trouble...
8 years again?!
These absolute morons. Keep it up Todd!
Can't wait to see it all come crashing down
It won't. Saudi has given them a perfect get out jail card for underperforming players on long contracts
Kinda weird for Chelsea to keep giving really long term contract
The American way.
8 years? That's some Bartomeu juice they're sipping.