this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
201 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37739 readers
500 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (19 children)

As always, there are several different aspects:

  • Promoting [Nazi propaganda and misinformation]
  • Laughing at [...]
  • Analyzing [...]
  • Profiting from [...]

Sometimes the difference between "promotion", "laughing at", and "analysis", depends more on the reader's approach, that on the writer's intent.

Then again, sometimes a reader decides they don't want to deal with any of it, which is also respectable.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 11 months ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryWhile McKenzie offers no evidence to back these ideas, this tracks with the company’s previous stance on taking a hands-off approach to moderation.

In April, Substack CEO Chris Best appeared on the Decoder podcast and refused to answer moderation questions.

“We’re not going to get into specific ‘would you or won’t you’ content moderation questions” over the issue of overt racism being published on the platform, Best said.

In a 2020 letter from Substack leaders, including Best and McKenzie, the company wrote, “We just disagree with those who would seek to tightly constrain the bounds of acceptable discourse.”

The Atlantic also pointed out an episode of McKenzie’s podcast with a guest, Richard Hanania, who has published racist views under a pseudonym.

McKenzie does, however, cite another Substack author who describes its approach to extremism as one that is “working the best.” What it’s being compared to, or by what measure, is left up to the reader’s interpretation.


Saved 57% of original text.

[–] beefcat@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

i never used substack before and they are doing a good job making sure i never do. i hope they like being the nazi bar.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›